Image Processor Super-Resolution Parameter Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional super-resolution technologies fail to effectively enhance video sharpness across different types of video sources, such as broadcasting and internet streams, due to varying information amounts and noise levels, leading to noticeable noise and degraded image quality.

Innovation Solution

An image processor with a resolution increase module, detector, and controller that adjusts the degree of super-resolution processing based on detected information amounts, noise levels, and video types, using super-resolution parameters to estimate original pixel values and restore images to higher resolutions, thereby optimizing sharpness and noise reduction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If super-resolution processing is applied to videos with low information amount and high noise (e.g., CS broadcasting), then video resolution is increased, but noise becomes noticeable and sharpness degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage sharpnessVSAvoidnoise visibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the processing parameters of super-resolution filtering based on the type of video signal. For videos with low information amount and high noise (e.g., CS broadcasting), the processing strength is reduced to minimize noise visibility. For videos with high information amount and low noise (e.g., BS broadcasting), the processing strength is increased to enhance sharpness. This parameter adaptation resolves the contradiction by dynamically adjusting the degree of super-resolution processing according to the specific video characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a detection mechanism that identifies the type of video signal (BS broadcasting, CS broadcasting, digital terrestrial broadcasting, analog terrestrial broadcasting, or Internet video) and provides feedback to control the super-resolution processing strength. This feedback loop enables the system to automatically adjust processing parameters based on the detected video type, ensuring optimal balance between sharpness enhancement and noise suppression for each video source.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If equivalent super-resolution processing is applied to all video types, then processing simplicity is maintained, but video quality varies due to different information amounts and noise levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevideo quality adaptationVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic processing by making the super-resolution strength variable rather than fixed. The processing strength is dynamically adjusted based on the detected video type, transitioning from static equivalent processing to adaptive dynamic processing. This allows the system to optimize quality for each video type while maintaining a unified processing framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different processing qualities to different video types. Instead of uniform processing, each video type (BS broadcasting, CS broadcasting, digital terrestrial broadcasting, analog terrestrial broadcasting, Internet video) receives tailored processing strength appropriate to its characteristics. This local quality differentiation enhances overall system adaptability without requiring completely separate processing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If sharpening processes are used to enhance video appearance, then edge sharpness is improved, but the technique cannot generate new high-frequency component pixels needed for true super-resolution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveedge sharpnessVSAvoidhigh-frequency component pixels
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges two previously separate processing approaches: super-resolution processing (which generates new high-frequency component pixels through interpolation) and sharpening processing (which enhances edge appearance). By combining these techniques and controlling their relative strengths based on video type, the system achieves both genuine resolution enhancement and visual sharpness improvement, resolving the limitation of using either technique alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS8265426B2Image processor and image processing method for increasing video resolution
Publication Date: 2012.09.11 HISENSE VISUAL TECH CO LTD
  • US8265426B2 patent drawing
  • US8265426B2 patent drawing
  • US8265426B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one embodiment, an image processor comprises an image converter and a controller. The image converter is configured to convert a first video signal of a first resolution to a second video signal of a second resolution higher than the first resolution. The conversion is based on a parameter indicating a ratio of high-frequency component pixels of the first video signal to be interpolated and pixels forming the first video signal to be interpolated. The controller is configured to change the parameter based on a type of broadcast wave of the first video signal. The type of broadcast wave may include, but is not limited or restricted to satellite broadcasting or terrestrial broadcasting.