Image Product Selection System Using Segmented Layout Display

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face challenges in selecting suitable multi-image and multi-media product designs, particularly when personal images are involved, due to the overwhelming number of layout options and the difficulty in finding the best aesthetic combination, leading to a tedious and time-consuming process.

Innovation Solution

A computer system with a graphical user interface (GUI) that allows users to select and composite digital images into image product representations, prioritizing and displaying preferred views separately to facilitate easier selection and reduce computational intensity, enabling users to choose and assemble personalized image products efficiently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated layout software positions images without intervention, then the design process is faster, but the aesthetic quality may not meet user preferences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign speedVSAvoidaesthetic quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the layout options into multiple pages, with each page displaying a limited number of composited image products. This segmentation allows automated processing to generate layouts efficiently while enabling users to review and select from organized groups, thereby maintaining both speed and aesthetic quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system generates a large number of layout variations (excessive action) but only displays a selective subset on each page (partial action). This approach allows the system to explore many aesthetic possibilities through automated processing while presenting users with manageable, curated selections that maintain high aesthetic quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Manufacturing precision

If manual selection and composition is used, then aesthetic quality can be optimized, but the process becomes extremely tedious

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaesthetic qualityVSAvoiddesign time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated compositing of images into multiple layout variations before user selection. This preliminary action generates ready-to-review composited image products, eliminating the need for users to manually compose each layout from scratch while still allowing aesthetic evaluation and selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates multiple copied variations of the user's images in different layout configurations. These copied composited image products allow users to review and compare aesthetic qualities across multiple options without manually recreating each layout, significantly reducing design time while maintaining aesthetic flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If a large number of layout options are displayed, then user choice is increased, but computational requirements increase and interactivity degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayout optionsVSAvoidcomputational requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the large set of layout options into multiple pages, with each page containing a manageable subset of composited image products. This segmentation reduces the computational load on any single display while maintaining access to the full variety of layouts through pagination, thereby preserving interactivity and user experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds the dimension of pagination to the display interface, organizing layouts across multiple pages rather than attempting to display all options simultaneously. This dimensional approach allows the system to maintain a large total number of layout options while keeping individual page displays computationally manageable and highly interactive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Ease of operation

If all image product representations are displayed together, then comparison is simplified, but the interface becomes cluttered and selection difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomparison easeVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the display into multiple pages, with each page showing a focused subset of composited image products. This segmentation allows users to compare layouts on each page without interface clutter, while the pagination system provides easy navigation to view all options across pages, maintaining both comparison ease and interface simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11721051B2Imaging product selection system
Publication Date: 2023.08.08 KODAK ALARIS LLC
  • US11721051B2 patent drawing
  • US11721051B2 patent drawing
  • US11721051B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer system for selecting image products includes a display for displaying digital images, and for displaying representations of image products. Digital images are composited into the displayed representations to form digitally composited image product views. Programming controls displaying the composited image product views separately from the unselected representations. One or more of the displayed composited image product views are selected and assembled or fabricated.