Automated Image Production Device Expiration Determination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual identification of image production devices nearing the end of their useful life leads to increased maintenance costs, SLA costs, and customer dissatisfaction due to the lack of automation in determining device expiration.

Innovation Solution

An automated method and apparatus that retrieve and compare values such as maintenance incident frequency, historical usage volume, SLA impacts, and projected future maintenance costs for both current and replacement devices to determine if a device should be replaced, with notifications sent for necessary replacements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual identification of image production devices is used, then device expiration can be identified, but maintenance costs increase and service level agreement costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice expiration identification accuracyVSAvoidmaintenance costs and SLA costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically monitors device usage patterns, maintenance history, and operational data without requiring manual intervention. The automated expiration determination system retrieves values related to the currently used device and replacement device, compares them, and notifies when replacement is needed, eliminating manual identification processes that lead to increased maintenance and SLA costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously retrieves and compares values related to device performance, maintenance incident frequency, and usage patterns. This feedback loop enables the system to dynamically determine when a device should be replaced based on actual performance data, preventing unnecessary maintenance costs and SLA penalties associated with manual monitoring approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If manual identification of image production devices is used, then device expiration can be identified, but customer satisfaction decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice expiration identification accuracyVSAvoidcustomer satisfaction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system handles device expiration monitoring and replacement determination without requiring customer involvement. By automatically retrieving device values, comparing them against replacement criteria, and sending notifications, the system eliminates manual processes that cause customer dissatisfaction, thereby improving ease of operation and customer satisfaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of energy

If automated determination of device expiration is implemented, then maintenance costs and SLA costs are reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance costs and SLA costsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses existing device management infrastructure and data retrieval mechanisms to perform automated expiration determination. By leveraging existing tools and data structures for retrieving device values, comparing metrics, and sending notifications, the system achieves cost reduction without proportionally increasing complexity, as it builds upon universal existing systems rather than creating entirely new complex infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8542378B2Method and apparatus for automated determination of expiration of an image production device that is currently in use by a customer
Publication Date: 2013.09.24 XEROX CORP
  • US8542378B2 patent drawing
  • US8542378B2 patent drawing
  • US8542378B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for automated determination of expiration of an image production device that is currently in use by a customer is disclosed. The method may include retrieving values related to a currently used image production device, determining an existing life value based on the retrieved values, retrieving values related to a replacement image production device, determining a replacement value based on the retrieved values comparing the determined existing life value to the determined replacement value, determining whether the currently used image production device should be replaced based on the comparison, and sending a notification that the currently used image production device should be replaced if it is determined that the currently used image production device should be replaced.