Image Provenance Verification for Authentic and Edited Content
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing methods cannot determine whether image modifications are made by a valid user or an invalid user, nor can they verify the authenticity of the original image being generated by a reliable imaging apparatus.
Innovation Solution
A system that includes an imaging apparatus, content management apparatus, and user terminal to generate and verify image files with metadata, hash values, and digital signatures to ensure authenticity and provenance, allowing determination of whether the image is tampered or edited by a reliable source.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If hash value verification is used to detect image modification, then tampering detection capability is improved, but the ability to distinguish valid editing from invalid tampering deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The verification system segments the authentication process into multiple independent components: hash value verification for integrity checking, metadata verification for editing history validation, and digital signature verification for source authentication. Each component handles a specific aspect of authenticity verification, allowing the system to distinguish between valid edits and invalid tampering by evaluating multiple segments together rather than relying on a single verification method
Solution Approach 2:
The system employs a composite verification approach by combining multiple verification mechanisms (hash values, metadata, digital signatures) into a unified authentication framework. This composite structure allows the system to leverage the strengths of each individual method while compensating for their weaknesses, enabling reliable distinction between legitimate editing and malicious tampering
2Loss of information
If metadata is added to indicate editing content, then information about modification validity is improved, but the ability to verify original image authenticity deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary authentication by verifying the digital signature and hash value of the original image before any editing occurs. This preliminary verification establishes a trusted baseline that preserves information about the original image's authenticity, allowing subsequent metadata to be added without compromising the ability to verify the original image's legitimacy
Solution Approach 2:
The verification system implements a nested structure where multiple layers of verification information are embedded within each other: hash values are nested within the image data, metadata containing editing history is nested within the file structure, and digital signatures are nested within the metadata. This nested organization allows verification of original image authenticity to occur at multiple levels simultaneously, preserving both modification validity information and original image verification capability
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
AI summary
The present invention is provided to enable determination of not only whether content is tampered by an invalid user but also whether an original content before change is the first content generated by a reliable content generation apparatus. A content management apparatus of the present invention receives content in content generation from the content generation apparatus and stores the generated content in a storage device. The content management apparatus acquires content to be determined and provenance information added to the content from a user terminal. The content management apparatus determines authenticity of the content to be determined based on whether the content in content generation corresponding to the content to be determined is stored in the storage device and a result of verification based on the provenance information. The content management apparatus notifies the user terminal of a result of determination.