Image Ranking and Selection Using Multi-Characteristic Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems lack an efficient method to automatically rank and select high-quality images from large collections based on multiple characteristics such as visual capture, social popularity, and visual content, often requiring significant computational resources and manual effort.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that examines images for visual capture characteristics, social popularity characteristics, and visual content characteristics, assigns individual scores, and determines overall scores to rank and select images for display, using a processor to weight characteristics and exclude undesirable content types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple image characteristics are examined and scored to determine rankings, then image selection quality is improved, but computational resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage selection qualityVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the image evaluation process into distinct characteristic categories (visual capture characteristics, visual content characteristics, and social popularity characteristics), each evaluated independently and scored separately. This segmentation allows the system to process multiple characteristics in an organized manner, improving selection quality while managing computational resources through structured evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by assigning different weights to individual characteristic scores when determining overall image rankings. By adjusting these weight parameters, the system can optimize the balance between comprehensive evaluation quality and computational efficiency, allowing flexible control over resource consumption based on specific application needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive image characteristics are evaluated, then ranking accuracy is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveranking accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-defining the three main characteristic categories and their sub-characteristics before the actual image evaluation process. This preliminary structuring allows for efficient processing during execution, as the evaluation framework is already established, reducing processing time while maintaining comprehensive and accurate ranking results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter changes by allowing flexible weighting of different characteristic scores. This enables optimization of processing time by adjusting which characteristics receive higher weights based on specific application requirements, thereby achieving accurate rankings without always processing all characteristics at maximum depth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If manual image selection is replaced with automated scoring, then productivity is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage selection efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the system to automatically evaluate and rank images without human intervention. The automated scoring mechanism examines multiple characteristics, calculates individual scores, and determines final rankings independently, dramatically improving productivity. The system serves itself by using predefined algorithms and weightings to make selection decisions that previously required manual human review.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent manages system complexity through parameter changes by allowing flexible adjustment of characteristic weights and evaluation criteria. This parametric approach enables the system to adapt to different application needs without requiring fundamental redesign, thereby improving productivity while keeping the system manageable through configurable parameters rather than hard-coded complex logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10417277B2Ranking and selecting images for display from a set of images
Publication Date: 2019.09.17 GOOGLE LLC
  • US10417277B2 patent drawing
  • US10417277B2 patent drawing
  • US10417277B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Implementations generally relate to ranking and selecting images for display from a set of images. In some implementations, a computer-implemented method includes providing selected images for display, including examining characteristics of a plurality of images, where the examined characteristics include two or more of: visual capture characteristics, visual content characteristics, and social popularity characteristics of the images. The method determines individual scores for the respective examined characteristics of the images, determines overall scores of the images based on a combination of the individual scores for the examined characteristics of the images, and determines a ranking of the images based on the overall scores. The method selects one or more images based on the ranking of the images, and causes a display of the one or more selected images.