Image Rejection Calibration Passive Network

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Low-IF receiver architectures face challenges in image rejection due to mismatches in in-phase and quadrature phase paths, leading to unacceptable reception quality from strong adjacent channels causing image interference.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that utilize a programmable gain amplifier and an image rejection circuit with controllable admittance networks to orthogonally correct gain and phase errors in the signal paths, including phase and gain correction circuits, to improve image rejection by injecting a tone and iteratively updating settings until desired signal power levels are met.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a typical low-IF receiver architecture is used, then the receiver can process RF signals, but mismatch between in-phase and quadrature phase paths causes image interference cross-talk that makes reception unacceptable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage rejectionVSAvoidphase path mismatch correction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The image rejection circuit is divided into separate controllable admittance networks for the in-phase and quadrature signal paths. Each path has its own adjustable admittance elements that can be independently controlled to correct phase and gain mismatches, allowing targeted correction without affecting the entire receiver architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs controllable admittance networks with selectable switching elements that can dynamically adjust the admittance values in real-time. This dynamic adjustment capability allows the system to adapt to varying signal conditions and correct phase/gain mismatches on-the-fly, improving image rejection without requiring complex fixed correction circuits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If strong adjacent channels are present, then the receiver can operate in typical environments, but they become image interference that makes reception unacceptable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereception quality in presence of adjacent channelsVSAvoidimage interference from adjacent channels
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the receiver measures the actual image rejection performance and uses this information to adjust the controllable admittance networks. The feedback loop continuously monitors reception quality and automatically tunes the admittance elements to optimize image rejection, enabling the system to adapt to strong adjacent channels dynamically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the admittance parameters of the correction circuits based on detected signal conditions. By adjusting the controllable admittance elements in response to the presence and strength of adjacent channels, the receiver optimizes its image rejection ratio dynamically, maintaining acceptable reception quality across varying environmental conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If image rejection calibration is implemented with controllable admittance networks, then image rejection improves to approximately 65 dB, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage rejection ratioVSAvoidcalibration circuit structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a simplified model of the signal paths with controllable admittance networks that replicate the essential correction functionality without requiring complex physical implementations. The controllable admittance networks provide a manageable complexity level while achieving the target 65 dB image rejection ratio, avoiding the need for overly complex calibration circuits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

Rather than using complex fixed correction circuits, the patent employs controllable admittance networks with adjustable parameters. This approach achieves the required image rejection ratio by dynamically tuning the admittance values, providing a more efficient solution that balances performance requirements with acceptable device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10469295B2Image rejection calibration with a passive network
Publication Date: 2019.11.05 SILICON LABORATORIES INC
  • US10469295B2 patent drawing
  • US10469295B2 patent drawing
  • US10469295B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one aspect, an apparatus includes: a mixer to receive a radio frequency (RF) signal and downconvert the RF signal into a second frequency signal; an amplifier coupled to the mixer to amplify the second frequency signal; an image rejection (IR) circuit coupled to the programmable gain amplifier (PGA) to orthogonally correct a gain and a phase of the amplified second frequency signal to output a corrected amplified second frequency signal; and a complex filter to filter the corrected amplified second frequency signal.