Image Collection Relevance Ordering for Automated Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face significant manual effort when selecting representative images from large collections for projects like photo albums or slideshows, as conventional image classification techniques do not adequately reduce the number of images required for inclusion.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system that automatically creates a scalable relevance ordered representation of an image collection by classifying images into clusters based on features like time, actors, and geographic locations, determining relevance measures, and ordering images according to their appeal and similarity, allowing for easy scaling to include only the most relevant images.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional image classification techniques are used to navigate through image collections, then users can more easily locate particular images, but users still expend a great deal of manual effort in selecting desired images

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of image navigationVSAvoidtime spent selecting images
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic image selection and ordering itself without requiring user intervention. The processor automatically classifies images into clusters, determines relevance measures, and orders images by relevance, allowing the system to serve itself in the image curation task rather than requiring manual user selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of image selection from manual user choice to automated relevance-based ordering. By computing relevance measures based on cluster proximity and image features, the system transforms the selection criterion from subjective user preference to objective computational metrics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If users manually sort through large image collections to select representative images, then they can choose images for projects, but the process requires significant manual effort and time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to select representative imagesVSAvoidtime spent sorting images
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification and relevance assessment of all images before the user needs to select any. By pre-organizing images into clusters and pre-computing relevance measures, the system prepares the image collection in advance so that when users do need images, they are already ordered by relevance and can be selected immediately

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical process of manual image sorting and selection with an automated computational system. Instead of users physically browsing and selecting images, the processor automatically classifies, measures relevance, and orders images based on computational algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Quantity of substance

If all images from a large collection are included in a photo album or slideshow, then complete coverage is achieved, but the project becomes unwieldy and difficult to manage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of images includedVSAvoidease of project management
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the most relevant images from the complete collection for inclusion in the project. By identifying and removing redundant or less relevant images through cluster-based classification and relevance ordering, the system leaves only the essential images needed for the photo album or slideshow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by including only a subset of images rather than all images. By ordering images by relevance and selecting only the top portion needed for the project, the system achieves sufficient coverage without the excess of including every available image

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8594440B2Automatic creation of a scalable relevance ordered representation of an image collection
Publication Date: 2013.11.26 HANGZHOU HIKVISION DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO LTD
  • US8594440B2 patent drawing
  • US8594440B2 patent drawing
  • US8594440B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method of automatically creating a scalable relevance ordered representation of an image collection, the images in the image collection are classified into a plurality of clusters based upon a feature of the images. In addition, respective relevance levels of the images contained in each of the plurality of clusters are determined and the images in each of the plurality of clusters are ordered according to the relevance levels. Moreover, the images from the ordered plurality of clusters are arranged according to a predefined arrangement process to create the scalable relevance ordered representation of the image collection.