Image Retrieval Accuracy via Local Feature Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image retrieval technologies face challenges in accurately distinguishing between candidate images due to similar global features caused by matching background environments and target object clothing, leading to reduced retrieval accuracy.

Innovation Solution

The method involves performing face and limb detection on video frames to extract face and limb features, which are then used to create reference motion trajectories, enhancing the accuracy of image retrieval by focusing on specific object features rather than global information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If global image features are used for image retrieval, then the method is simple to implement, but the retrieval accuracy deteriorates when background environments or clothing are similar

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidretrieval accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the image into multiple body parts (face, upper body, lower body, limbs) and extracts features for each part separately. This segmentation allows the system to focus on discriminative local features rather than global features, resolving the contradiction by maintaining implementation simplicity through modular feature extraction while improving accuracy through part-specific feature comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts specific local features (face features, limb features, body part features) from the global image. By taking out and focusing on these key local features that are less likely to be similar across different images, the system achieves better retrieval accuracy while maintaining a relatively simple implementation through targeted feature extraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Productivity

If only global image features are extracted, then the processing speed is fast, but the ability to distinguish between similar images deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidimage distinction capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the image processing task into multiple parallel segmentation operations (face detection, limb detection, body part detection). This segmentation enables the system to process multiple features simultaneously rather than sequentially, maintaining processing speed while improving distinction capability through multi-dimensional feature comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple local features (face features, limb features, body part features) into a comprehensive feature representation. By combining these features in a unified retrieval framework, the system achieves both fast processing through efficient feature fusion and high reliability through multiple distinguishing feature dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If multiple local features are extracted and compared, then the retrieval accuracy improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretrieval accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the feature extraction process into independent modules for different body parts. Each module (face feature extraction, limb feature extraction, body part feature extraction) operates independently and can be implemented using standard computer vision techniques, reducing system complexity while enabling multiple local features to be extracted and compared for high retrieval accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Use of energy by moving object

If global features are used, then the computational resources required are low, but the feature discriminability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational resource consumptionVSAvoidfeature discriminability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the most discriminative local features (face, limbs, body parts) rather than processing the entire global image. This selective extraction reduces computational resource consumption by focusing on key regions while maintaining high feature discriminability through the unique characteristics of each body part.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20240193790A1Data processing method and apparatus, electronic device, storage medium, and program product
Publication Date: 2024.06.13 TENCENT TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO LTD
  • US20240193790A1 patent drawing
  • US20240193790A1 patent drawing
  • US20240193790A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This application provides a data processing method performed by an electronic device to improve accuracy of image retrieval. The method includes: respectively performing face detection on at least one reference video frame included in a reference video based on a specified target object type, to obtain at least one face image; extracting a face feature from the face image; respectively performing limb detection on the reference video frame based on the target object type, to obtain at least one limb image; extracting a limb feature from the limb image; and obtaining at least one reference motion trajectory based on each face image and each limb image, each reference motion trajectory comprising a plurality of limb features and a plurality of face features of a target object.