Image Saliency Analysis Using Low- and High-Order Features

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing saliency evaluation methods, both bottom-up and top-down, fail to accurately predict line-of-sight guidance and provide actionable insights for improving design saliency, with bottom-up methods lacking line-of-sight predictability and top-down methods lacking factor transparency.

Innovation Solution

A saliency analysis system that extracts both low-order and high-order image feature amounts to calculate saliencies, integrating these features to generate a saliency map that reflects human visual fixation patterns and provides actionable improvement suggestions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If bottom-up type evaluation method based on low-order image feature amounts is used, then saliency evaluation can be performed, but line-of-sight predictability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesaliency evaluation accuracyVSAvoidline-of-sight predictability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines bottom-up low-order image feature amounts with top-down high-order image feature amounts (including eye tracking data and deep learning models) to calculate saliency. This merging allows the system to maintain the computational efficiency of bottom-up methods while incorporating the line-of-sight predictability and human visual behavior understanding from top-down methods, thereby resolving the contradiction between evaluation accuracy and line-of-sight predictability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a composite approach by integrating multiple types of feature amounts (low-order image features, high-order image features, eye tracking data, and deep learning predictions) into a unified saliency calculation framework. This composite material approach enables the system to leverage the strengths of different methods while mitigating their individual weaknesses, achieving both accurate saliency evaluation and reliable line-of-sight prediction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If top-down type approach using deep learning is used, then line-of-sight predictability is improved, but factor transparency is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveline-of-sight predictabilityVSAvoidfactor transparency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the saliency calculation into distinct components: low-order image feature amounts, high-order image feature amounts, eye tracking data, and deep learning predictions. By segmenting the complex deep learning process into interpretable components, the system maintains line-of-sight predictability while providing factor transparency, allowing designers to understand which factors contribute most to saliency evaluation results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer that translates complex deep learning predictions into interpretable feature amounts. This intermediary mechanism preserves the predictive accuracy of deep learning models while making the decision factors transparent and actionable for designers, effectively mediating between model accuracy and interpretability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If deep learning based saliency evaluation is used, then evaluation result is obtained, but actionable improvement guidance is difficult to obtain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation efficiencyVSAvoidimprovement guidance availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism by calculating not only the overall saliency but also the contribution of each individual feature amount (low-order and high-order features, eye tracking, deep learning components). This detailed feedback information enables the system to provide actionable improvement guidance, showing designers exactly which factors contribute to low saliency scores and how to adjust their designs accordingly, while maintaining high evaluation efficiency through automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12561778B2Saliency analysis system, saliency analysis method and recording medium
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 KONICA MINOLTA INC
  • US12561778B2 patent drawing
  • US12561778B2 patent drawing
  • US12561778B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A saliency analysis system includes: an input receiver that receives an evaluation target image; and a hardware processor, wherein the hardware processor extracts low-order image feature amounts and high-order image feature amounts, from the evaluation target image, and calculates saliencies in the image, based on the low-order image feature amounts and the high-order image feature amounts.