Image Scaling Error Allocation for Density Uniformity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image scaling methods, such as the nearest neighbor method, result in density unevenness and changes in image form due to pixel insertion or deletion, particularly in fine patterns, leading to noticeable horizontal streaks and local density variations.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus and method that determines pixel operation positions, calculates density differences as errors, and allocates these errors to adjacent pixels to maintain pixel values within an allowable range, preventing isolated points and density variations during scaling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the nearest neighbor method is used for image scaling, then image sharpness is maintained, but density unevenness occurs in the form of horizontal streaks in fine patterns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage sharpnessVSAvoiddensity unevenness and horizontal streaks
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by dispersing pixel insertion positions according to a dispersal pattern (such as V-shaped patterns) rather than inserting pixels uniformly in lines. This causes different regions of the image to experience different insertion behaviors, eliminating the systematic horizontal streaks while preserving local sharpness characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces asymmetry through the use of non-uniform dispersal patterns (V-shaped arrangements) for pixel insertion. This asymmetric distribution of insertion positions breaks the symmetry of horizontal streaks and creates a more natural, uniform appearance in the scaled image.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Object-generated harmful factors

If pixel insertion position is dispersed according to a repeating pattern, then density unevenness becomes less noticeable, but local density varies at pixel inserting positions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedensity unevenness visibilityVSAvoidlocal density consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting pixel values at insertion positions based on calculated density differences. The pixel value is modified according to the formula: new pixel value = old pixel value + density difference × correction coefficient, where the correction coefficient is determined by the dispersal pattern. This compensates for local density variations while maintaining the overall dispersal pattern benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If density of inserted pixels is determined to maintain constant density in the vicinity, then isolated points are generated at pixel inserting positions, resulting in changes of image form

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedensity consistency in vicinityVSAvoidimage form
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using different correction coefficients for different regions based on the dispersal pattern. Pixels in different locations receive different levels of correction according to their specific positions in the V-shaped pattern, allowing density compensation without creating uniform isolated points that would distort the overall image form.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by introducing position-dependent correction coefficients that vary based on the dispersal pattern. This ensures that density compensation is applied differently at different locations, preventing the creation of isolated points while still maintaining density consistency in the vicinity of insertion positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8606048B2Image processing apparatus and image processing method
Publication Date: 2013.12.10 KONICA MINOLTA INC
  • US8606048B2 patent drawing
  • US8606048B2 patent drawing
  • US8606048B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing apparatus for scaling an image including: an operation position determining section for determining a pixel operation position, which is either a pixel inserting or deleting position, based on a scaling ratio; an inserting/deleting section for inserting/deleting a pixel to/from the pixel operation position determined by the operation position determining section; an error calculating section for calculating a density difference as an error between densities in a vicinity of the inserted/deleted pixel via the inserting/deleting section, before and after the insertion or deletion; and an error allocating section for allocating the error, calculated by the error calculating section, to the inserted pixel and pixels in a vicinity of the inserted or deleted pixel, so that a pixel value, after allocation, of a pixel of an allocation destination, falls within an allowable range estimated from a pixel value of a pixel near the pixel of allocation destination.