Image Sensor Parameter Optimization Using Score-Based Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image sensor parameter optimization systems fail to effectively determine optimal sensing parameters for image quality, especially in varying lighting environments, as they rely on neural networks that cannot calculate gradients for certain parameters, leading to suboptimal image capture.

Innovation Solution

A parameter optimization system that includes an image sensor with a parameter setting unit, a score calculation unit, and a parameter determination unit, which calculates scores from images and determines optimal sensing parameter values based on the scores, regardless of whether gradients can be calculated by neural networks, allowing for improved image quality across different environments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If neural networks are used to optimize sensing parameters, then automation is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates for parameters where gradient calculation is not possible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter optimization automationVSAvoidsensing parameter optimization precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the parameter optimization process into two distinct phases: a learning phase where the neural network learns the relationship between sensing parameters and image quality scores from training data, and an application phase where the learned model directly evaluates and optimizes parameters. This segmentation allows the system to handle parameters where gradient calculation is not possible by relying on the pre-trained evaluation model rather than real-time gradient computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediate score evaluation model (trained neural network) that acts as a mediator between the sensing parameters and the final image quality assessment. Instead of directly optimizing parameters through gradient-based methods, the system uses this intermediate model to evaluate potential parameter settings and guide the optimization process, enabling precise optimization even when direct gradient calculation is infeasible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If gradient-based optimization is used, then manufacturing precision is improved for differentiable parameters, but adaptability deteriorates for parameters where gradients cannot be calculated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter optimization precisionVSAvoidparameter type compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal optimization framework that can handle multiple types of sensing parameters (both differentiable and non-differentiable) through a single system architecture. The score evaluation model serves multiple functions: it evaluates image quality for parameter optimization, guides the search for optimal parameters, and adapts to different parameter types without requiring different optimization methods, thus achieving both precision and versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the optimization approach by changing from direct gradient-based parameter adjustment to a score-guided parameter search. By using the trained neural network to evaluate scores for different parameter settings and then optimizing based on these scores (through methods like grid search, random search, or other score-based optimization), the system can effectively optimize any parameter type regardless of whether gradients are available.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If traditional parameter optimization methods are used, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity deteriorates due to inability to optimize all parameter types effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization system complexityVSAvoidimage quality optimization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional gradient-based mechanical optimization methods with a data-driven score evaluation approach. Instead of relying on mathematical gradients and complex analytical solutions, the system uses a trained neural network to directly evaluate image quality scores for given parameters, simplifying the optimization mechanism while dramatically improving its effectiveness for both differentiable and non-differentiable parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12108167B2Optimizing sensing parameter in imaging device using scores
Publication Date: 2024.10.01 NEC CORP
  • US12108167B2 patent drawing
  • US12108167B2 patent drawing
  • US12108167B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A parameter optimization system (10) includes: an image sensor (110) having at least one sensing parameter; a parameter setting unit (120) configured to be able to change the sensing parameter; a score calculation unit (130) configured to calculate a score from an image acquired by the image sensor; and a parameter determination unit (140) configured to determine a right parameter value that is a value of the sensing parameter at which the score is relatively high, based on a value of the sensing parameter and the score corresponding to the value of the sensing parameter. According to such a parameter optimization system, the sensing parameter of the image sensor can be set to an appropriate value.