Image Similarity Evaluation Using SSIM and SIFT Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current image-search algorithms, relying on pixel-based techniques like MSE and PSNR, often misidentify similar images due to absolute error analysis, leading to incorrect matches, such as red jalapenos being mistaken for red tomatoes, due to similar red pixels.

Innovation Solution

A system computes a structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) values, along with histogram analysis, to objectively evaluate the similarity between images based on luminance, contrast, structure, and features, providing a more accurate similarity score.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If pixel-based techniques like MSE and PSNR are used for image similarity search, then computation is simple and fast, but image similarity evaluation is inaccurate leading to incorrect matches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage similarity evaluation accuracyVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the image comparison process into multiple independent feature analysis components: SSIM analysis (luminance, contrast, structure), SIFT feature extraction, and histogram comparison. Each component evaluates a specific aspect of image similarity, and their results are combined to produce a comprehensive similarity score. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high measurement precision by analyzing multiple dimensions of similarity while maintaining manageable algorithm complexity through modular computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If pixel-by-pixel analysis is used to measure image similarity, then computation is straightforward, but the method cannot distinguish between visually similar but content-wise distinct images

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage match accuracyVSAvoidcontent information loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality analysis by examining specific structural and feature-level properties of images rather than treating all pixels uniformly. The SSIM metric evaluates local luminance, contrast, and structural relationships, while SIFT extracts localized feature descriptors that capture distinctive content characteristics. This approach preserves content information by focusing on structurally and semantically meaningful image properties, enabling reliable distinction between visually similar but content-wise distinct images such as red jalapenos versus red tomatoes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11928850B2Evaluation of similar content-based images
Publication Date: 2024.03.12 SONY GROUP CORP
  • US11928850B2 patent drawing
  • US11928850B2 patent drawing
  • US11928850B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Implementations generally relate to evaluation of similar content-based images. In some implementations, a method includes receiving a first image, where the first image includes at least one first object. The method further includes receiving a second image, where the second image includes at least one second object. The method further includes computing a structural similarity index measure (SSIM) value based on the at least one first object and the at least one second object. The method further includes computing a scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) value based on the at least one first object and the at least one second object. The method further includes computing a histogram value based on the at least one first object and the at least one second object. The method further includes computing a similarity score based on the SSIM value, the SIFT value, and the histogram value.