User-Defined Image Sorting Rules for Cloud Storage Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image sorting methods lack the ability to efficiently manage and automatically sort images based on user-defined rules, particularly in cloud-based systems, leading to inefficiencies in storage and transmission.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus with a management unit, sort unit, and display control unit that allows users to generate and manage image sorting rules, enabling automatic sorting and transmission to external services based on predefined criteria, including object categories and facial recognition, while also supporting rules for non-matching images.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual image sorting is used, then user control over image classification is maintained, but time consumption and labor burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage sorting efficiencyVSAvoiduser operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables users to define their own classification rules through a user-friendly interface, and the system automatically executes the sorting based on these rules. The automatic sorting function processes images without requiring manual intervention for each classification decision, thereby improving productivity while maintaining user control through rule definition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Users prepare classification rules in advance through the rule setting interface, and the system stores these rules for automatic execution. This preliminary rule configuration allows the system to perform efficient automatic sorting without requiring complex real-time decision-making during the actual image processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If automatic sorting based on user-defined rules is implemented, then sorting efficiency improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic sorting speedVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the image sorting task into separate functional modules: a rule definition module where users configure classification criteria, a rule storage module that saves the defined rules, and an automatic sorting module that executes the sorting based on stored rules. This segmentation allows each module to be simple and independent, reducing overall system complexity while enabling efficient automatic sorting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a rule representation layer that mediates between user intentions and automatic sorting execution. Users define rules in a simplified interface, the system translates these into executable sorting criteria, and then applies them automatically. This intermediary layer simplifies the interaction between users and the complex sorting logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If images are manually sorted and stored, then storage organization is controlled by user preferences, but storage capacity utilization is inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage organization efficiencyVSAvoidstorage capacity usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously processes images through automatic sorting based on user-defined rules, maintaining consistent organization without interruption. The automatic sorting function operates continuously on incoming images, ensuring that storage capacity is continuously optimized according to user preferences rather than requiring periodic manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Adaptability or versatility

If cloud-based image management is used, then accessibility and collaboration improve, but data transmission and storage costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecloud service functionalityVSAvoiddata transmission and storage resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and transmits only the classified image data to external services based on user-defined rules, rather than transmitting all images regardless of their classification. This selective transmission approach reduces unnecessary data transfer and storage resources while maintaining the adaptability of cloud-based collaboration and accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20260057010A1Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 CANON KK
  • US20260057010A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057010A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057010A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus includes a management unit configured to manage images of a user; a sort unit configured to sort out, from the managed images, an image that matches a rule selected by the user, and a display control unit configured to display a first setting screen for the user to select the rule, wherein the first setting screen includes, as the rule, a first rule generated by the user and a second rule for sorting out an image that does not match the first rule.