Image Stitching via Rigid and Non-Rigid Registration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image stitching technologies face content discontinuities due to deformation information from different acquisition parameters, leading to poor continuity in combined images.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that perform rigid and non-rigid registrations on overlapping image sections to generate corrected images, which are then combined using weight functions to improve content continuity and image quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If multiple images with different acquisition parameters are combined using traditional stitching technology, then the coverage area of the combined image is expanded, but content discontinuities occur due to deformation information differences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage area of combined imageVSAvoidcontent continuity of combined image
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary registration (both rigid and non-rigid) on the images before combining them. This preliminary alignment process corrects deformation information differences caused by varying acquisition parameters, ensuring that content continuity is maintained while still achieving expanded coverage area through the combination of multiple images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the deformation information parameters from different acquisition conditions into a unified reference frame. By applying non-rigid registration that adjusts local deformation parameters, the system reconciles differences in acquisition parameters while preserving the expanded coverage benefit of combining multiple images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If rigid registration is performed on overlapping image sections, then alignment efficiency is improved, but local deformation information is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregistration efficiencyVSAvoidlocal alignment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the registration process into two distinct stages: rigid registration for global alignment and non-rigid registration for local refinement. The rigid registration stage provides efficient overall positioning, while the subsequent non-rigid registration stage corrects local deformation information, thus achieving both high efficiency and high precision without compromising either aspect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces non-rigid registration as an intermediary step between rigid registration and final image combination. This intermediary process bridges the gap by taking the efficiently aligned result from rigid registration and refining it with detailed local deformation corrections, thereby preserving both efficiency gains and precision requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If non-rigid registration is performed on all images, then content continuity is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent continuity of combined imageVSAvoidcomputational complexity of processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the application of non-rigid registration to only the overlapping regions of images rather than processing entire images. This segmentation approach maintains content continuity in the critical overlapping areas where deformation differences matter most, while significantly reducing computational complexity by avoiding redundant processing of non-overlapping regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies non-rigid registration selectively to local overlapping regions rather than uniformly across all images. This local quality approach ensures that computational resources are concentrated where they are most needed (in overlapping areas requiring continuity) while reducing overall complexity by excluding non-overlapping regions from intensive processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Manufacturing precision

If weight functions are used to combine corrected images, then image quality in overlapping regions is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality of combined imageVSAvoidprocessing time for image combination
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary corrections on individual images before the combination stage, preparing them in advance for efficient merging. This preliminary action includes applying the weight functions to determine contribution levels of each image in overlapping regions beforehand, so that the actual combination process requires minimal additional computation, thus improving image quality while limiting time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20230082641A1Systems and methods for image processing
Publication Date: 2023.03.16 SHANGHAI UNITED IMAGING HEALTHCARE
  • US20230082641A1 patent drawing
  • US20230082641A1 patent drawing
  • US20230082641A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure may provide a system. The system may obtain a first image of a first region of a subject and a second image of a second region of the subject. The first region and the second region may have an overlapping region. The system may generate a first corrected image by correcting the first image based on the second image and a second corrected image by correcting the second image based on the first image. The system may generate a combined image by combining the first corrected image and the second corrected image.