Image Style Feature Modeling for Content Performance Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining how content items will perform among a target audience are inefficient and inaccurate, often requiring costly and time-consuming 'A/B testing, and traditional research techniques are limited by small sample sizes and human bias.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning model is trained using extracted stylistic features from images, such as object and scene tensors, to predict performance scores for candidate images, enabling real-time evaluation of content across multiple audiences without human feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional research techniques and A/B testing are used to determine content performance, then measurement precision can be achieved, but loss of time and loss of energy increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent performance prediction accuracyVSAvoidtime required for A/B testing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by training a machine learning model in advance using historical content performance data and audience engagement metrics. This pre-trained model can then predict content performance for new candidates without requiring time-consuming A/B testing, thus resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical A/B testing process with an automated machine learning prediction system. Instead of physically conducting controlled experiments with content variations, the system uses computational models to simulate and predict performance outcomes, eliminating the time and energy costs associated with traditional testing while maintaining prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If A/B testing is conducted to evaluate content performance, then measurement precision improves, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent performance prediction accuracyVSAvoidenergy consumption of testing process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system substitutes energy-intensive A/B testing with computationally efficient machine learning inference. Once the model is trained, generating performance predictions requires minimal computational resources compared to conducting actual A/B tests, thus maintaining measurement precision while significantly reducing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the content evaluation process through machine learning models. Instead of physically testing content variations with real audiences (which consumes energy), the system uses trained models to simulate and evaluate content performance virtually, achieving the same measurement goals with fractionated energy usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Device complexity

If traditional research methods are used with small sample sizes, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of research methodVSAvoidperformance prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the fundamental parameters of the evaluation approach by transitioning from small-sample traditional research to large-scale machine learning training. The model processes vast amounts of historical content performance data and audience engagement metrics, transforming the input parameters from limited samples to comprehensive datasets, thereby achieving high measurement precision without excessive device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model serves multiple functions: it predicts performance scores, identifies audience preferences, and evaluates content across diverse categories. This multi-functionality allows the system to achieve high measurement precision for various content types using a single unified model, avoiding the need for separate simple research methods for each content category.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12505470B2Systems, methods, and storage media for training a machine learning model
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 VIZIT LABS INC
  • US12505470B2 patent drawing
  • US12505470B2 patent drawing
  • US12505470B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and storage media for training a machine learning model are disclosed. Exemplary implementations may select a set of training images for a machine learning model, extract object features from each training image to generate an object tensor for each training image, extract stylistic features from each training image to generate a stylistic feature tensor for each training image, determine an engagement metric for each training image, and train a neural network comprising a plurality of nodes arranged in a plurality of sequential layers.