Computer-Assisted Image Text and Visual Styling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current image editing processes require extensive user effort and time to apply relevant text and visual styling to digital images, especially when dealing with large collections, and often result in suboptimal modifications that do not accurately reflect the image content.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that automatically determines image characteristics, generates and refines text, and applies visual modifications based on these characteristics, allowing for efficient and contextually relevant text and visual styling suggestions, reducing user input and effort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual image editing is performed by users, then customization and control over image modifications are improved, but time consumption and user effort increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoidediting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of image characteristics, content, and context before the user begins editing. It pre-generates multiple modified versions with different styles, filters, and text overlays based on automatic image recognition, so that when the user opens the editor, ready-to-apply modifications are already prepared, dramatically reducing the time needed to create personalized images

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables images to edit themselves by automatically analyzing image content, selecting appropriate modifications, and generating multiple styled versions without requiring manual user intervention for each editing decision. The user simply reviews and selects from pre-generated options, transforming the editing process from an active manual task to a passive selection task

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If extensive manual editing is performed to achieve high-quality modifications, then image personalization quality is improved, but user effort and complexity of operation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodification qualityVSAvoidediting complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The editing system segments the complex editing process into distinct independent modules: automatic image analysis, style selection, filter application, text overlay, and version generation. Each module handles a specific aspect of modification independently, allowing the system to maintain high quality through specialized processing in each segment while keeping the overall user interface simple and manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically adjusts multiple image parameters (brightness, contrast, saturation, sharpness, color balance) based on analyzed image characteristics and selected styles. By programmatically optimizing these parameters according to established quality criteria rather than requiring manual tuning, the system achieves high modification quality while eliminating the complexity of parameter adjustment from the user workflow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If automatic image analysis is performed to reduce user input, then user effort is reduced, but system processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser input requirementVSAvoidsystem processing resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial automatic analysis by focusing only on the most critical image characteristics needed for style selection (dominant colors, main subjects, overall mood) rather than analyzing every detail of the image. This selective analysis approach reduces computational overhead and energy consumption while still providing sufficient information to generate high-quality modified versions with minimal user input

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple modified versions are generated automatically, then image personalization options are improved, but system processing time and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodification varietyVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system develops a universal image modification framework that can generate multiple styled versions using a single integrated processing pipeline. The same core analysis and modification algorithms serve multiple output variations by applying different style parameters and combinations to the analyzed image, allowing the system to produce diverse modified versions efficiently without requiring separate processing for each style

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10049477B1Computer-assisted text and visual styling for images
Publication Date: 2018.08.14 GOOGLE LLC
  • US10049477B1 patent drawing
  • US10049477B1 patent drawing
  • US10049477B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Implementations can relate to providing computer-assisted text and visual styling for images. In some implementations, a computer-implemented method includes determining a set of characteristics of an image, and applying one or more first visual modifications to the image based on one or more of the set of characteristics of the image. The method can include receiving user input defining user text, providing the user text in the image, and applying one or more second visual modifications to the image based on the user text and based on at least one of the set of characteristics of the image.