Digital Image Timestamping via Blockchain and Pre-generated Codes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current timestamping systems for digital images lack a reliable method to prove posteriority, as images can be easily falsified by altering timestamp data, and existing methods for anteriority do not effectively guarantee the date of creation.

Innovation Solution

A method and device using a first computer server to generate and deliver a code unknown in advance, which is then incorporated into a digital image, allowing for simultaneous recording of posteriority and anteriority dates using a chain of blocks, with a second server providing a certified timestamp, and optionally using a third server for data sharing and efficiency, reducing the time interval between these dates to minimize falsification risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If standard camera timestamping systems are used, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to easy falsification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a trusted third party (timestamping authority) as an intermediary between the camera and the timestamp verification system. This intermediary signs timestamps using cryptographic keys, creating a chain of trust that prevents falsification while maintaining ease of use. The timestamping authority acts as a mediator that validates time information without requiring users to manage complex cryptographic operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-establishing cryptographic key pairs for the timestamping authority before the actual timestamping operation. The public key is made available in advance for verification, while the private key remains securely stored. This preliminary setup enables reliable timestamps without requiring complex operations during the actual image capture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If certified timestamping systems are used, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the complex cryptographic timestamping functionality from the camera device and places it in a separate trusted third party system. The camera only needs to capture the image and include a simple timestamp, while the complex verification and certification operations are performed by the external timestamping authority. This extraction reduces the complexity of the camera device while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses cryptographic copying by creating a digital signature that copies the timestamp information in a verified form. Instead of requiring the entire complex verification system to be embedded in the camera, the patent creates a simplified copy of the timestamping function through cryptographic signatures that can be verified independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If the time interval between posteriority and anteriority dates is reduced, then reliability is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The timestamping authority performs preliminary action by pre-calculating and storing the relationship between posteriority and anteriority dates in its database before the actual image processing. When an image is submitted, the system only needs to retrieve the pre-computed timestamp information, significantly reducing the processing time required to establish the time interval relationship.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the timestamping authority continuously monitors and updates the time interval relationships in its database. This feedback loop allows the system to maintain accurate and up-to-date information about the relationship between posteriority and anteriority dates, enabling fast retrieval without requiring complex real-time calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3346442B1Methods and devices for timestamping digital images
Publication Date: 2022.02.02 QUANTIFICARE
  • EP3346442B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3346442B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3346442B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A method and device for timestamping digital images. This method and device guarantees the date of creation (P) and date of acquisition (A) of a digital image (IN), including the creation of a pre-existing unknown code (C) and its transmission via a computer server at the date of creation (P); the acquisition of a digital image containing a subject (S) and the code (C); the creation of a digital fingerprint (EIN) of the digital image (IN); the server's receipt of the digital fingerprint (EIN) at the date of acquisition (A) and recording of this combination in a blockchain; and potentially the retrieval of the recorded date and date of creation from a digital image. The invention is particularly suited to using images to verify the proper execution of clinical trial protocols.