Image Warping With Staged Decimation and Interpolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image warping technologies face inefficiencies in terms of latency and memory requirements due to concurrent performance of decimation and interpolation operations, which limits the ability to handle extreme scaling factors and foveated image rendering effectively.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of separate decimation and interpolation operations, combined with the use of partial frame memory and dynamically sized column buffers, reduces latency and memory overhead by allowing more efficient warping of images, particularly in applications like augmented and virtual reality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If decimation and interpolation operations are performed concurrently, then processing speed is improved, but memory requirements and latency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidmemory requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the image warping process into two separate stages: decimation (subsampling) and interpolation (upsampling). Each stage is handled by dedicated circuitry operating at different clock rates. The decimator operates at a lower clock rate after reducing sample density, while the interpolator operates at a higher clock rate to reconstruct the final image. This segmentation eliminates the need for large memory buffers required by concurrent operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The decimation operation is performed first as a preliminary step before interpolation. By subsampling the image first and generating a decimated image, the system reduces the data volume that needs to be processed and stored. This preliminary action allows subsequent interpolation to work with fewer data points, reducing memory requirements while maintaining processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If decimation and interpolation are performed concurrently, then processing throughput is improved, but latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing throughputVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the processing pipeline into distinct decimation and interpolation phases with dedicated hardware for each. The decimator circuitry processes input images at a reduced clock rate, then the interpolator circuitry processes the decimated images at a higher clock rate. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized independently, reducing overall latency while maintaining throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts operating clock rates for different processing stages. The decimator operates at a lower clock rate appropriate for its reduced data volume, while the interpolator operates at a higher clock rate to meet throughput requirements. This dynamic rate adjustment optimizes both latency and productivity by matching processing speed to data volume at each stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If extreme scaling factors are applied, then image transformation capability is improved, but computational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage transformation capabilityVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation to handle extreme scaling factors by separating magnification and minification operations into distinct processing paths. The decimator handles minification by subsampling, while the interpolator handles magnification by upsampling. This segmentation allows each operation to be optimized for its specific function, reducing computational cost compared to applying general-purpose warping algorithms to all scaling scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different processing quality and complexity to different regions and operations. For minification, simple decimation is sufficient and computationally efficient. For magnification, interpolation is applied to the decimated image. This local quality approach ensures adequate image quality for each operation type while minimizing computational cost, particularly for extreme scaling factors where one operation dominates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12354231B2Methods and apparatus to warp images with decimation and interpolation
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US12354231B2 patent drawing
  • US12354231B2 patent drawing
  • US12354231B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, apparatus, systems, and articles of manufacture are disclosed to warp images for video processing. An example device includes horizontal warper circuitry configured to access an input image, decimate a first set of pixels in the input image by row, and interpolate a second set of pixels in the input image by row to produce a horizontally warped image. The example device further includes vertical warper circuitry configured to access the horizontally warped image, decimate a first set of pixels in the horizontally warped image by column, and interpolate a second set of pixels in the horizontally warped image by column to produce an output image.