Automated Image Zooming via Salient Content Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional image zooming techniques are time-consuming and often result in poorly composed images, as users lack the skills to manually select optimal zoomed croppings that maintain important content and composition rules.

Innovation Solution

An automated system scores zoomed croppings based on their inclusion of salient content, centering, and preservation of specified regions, suggesting the best cropping at various scales to users, allowing for efficient and compositionally sound image zooming.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual zooming is performed by users, then the user can control the zoomed cropping, but the process is time-consuming and may result in poorly composed images

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoidtime-consuming
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated zooming operations by itself without requiring user intervention. The processor automatically generates multiple zoomed croppings at different scales, scores them based on composition criteria, and selects the best result, allowing the system to serve itself rather than requiring continuous user control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-generates multiple zoomed croppings at various scales before user selection. By creating a set of candidate croppings in advance and scoring them according to composition rules, the system prepares options beforehand, reducing the time users would otherwise spend manually adjusting zoom parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If manual zooming is performed by users, then the user can select the zoom level, but the composition quality may be poor due to lack of photography skills

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoidcomposition quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system scores each zoomed cropping based on composition criteria such as rule of thirds, leading lines, and balancing elements. This automated feedback mechanism evaluates the composition quality objectively, ensuring that only well-composed croppings are selected without requiring users to have expert photography knowledge

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical skill-based process of manual composition judgment with an automated computational approach. The processor uses algorithms to evaluate composition quality based on established photography rules, substituting human expertise with machine-based analysis that consistently applies composition principles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If automated scoring of zoomed croppings is performed, then the time required for zooming is reduced, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvezooming efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated scoring system is divided into distinct functional modules: generating zoomed croppings at multiple scales, scoring each cropping based on composition criteria, and selecting the best result. This segmentation allows the complex task to be broken into manageable steps that can be processed systematically, improving efficiency without overwhelming system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system varies parameters such as zoom scale (1.5x, 2x, 4x, 16x) and composition weighting factors to optimize the zooming process. By changing these parameters systematically, the system achieves high productivity through automated evaluation while managing complexity through structured parameter control rather than unmanageable algorithmic complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple zoomed croppings are generated at different scales, then the quality of the selected cropping is improved, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecropping qualityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates zoomed croppings at multiple scales (1.5x, 2x, 4x, 16x) to ensure high quality results, but applies partial action by scoring and selecting from this predetermined set of scales rather than generating all possible zoom levels. This approach achieves sufficient quality improvement while limiting processing time by focusing on the most useful zoom scales

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9805445B2Image zooming
Publication Date: 2017.10.31 ADOBE INC
  • US9805445B2 patent drawing
  • US9805445B2 patent drawing
  • US9805445B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Image zooming is described. In one or more implementations, zoomed croppings of an image are scored. The scores calculated for the zoomed croppings are indicative of a zoomed cropping's inclusion of content that is captured in the image. For example, the scores are indicative of a degree to which a zoomed cropping includes salient content of the image, a degree to which the salient content included in the zoomed cropping is centered in the image, and a degree to which the zoomed cropping preserves specified regions-to-keep and excludes specified regions-to-remove. Based on the scores, at least one zoomed cropping may be chosen to effectuate a zooming of the image. Accordingly, the image may be zoomed according to the zoomed cropping such that an amount the image is zoomed corresponds to a scale of the zoomed cropping.