Imager Segmentation for Reflective Surface Data Reading

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

General-purpose data readers face difficulties in reliably reading optical codes on highly reflective surfaces due to saturation issues and inefficient resource allocation between reading modes for reflective and non-reflective surfaces.

Innovation Solution

A data reader with an imager divided into portions for reading optical codes from highly reflective and non-reflective surfaces, controlled by a processor that manages illumination output and interleaves reading periods to minimize reflectivity issues and optimize resource usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If artificial illumination is used to illuminate optical codes on reflective surfaces, then the image contrast is improved, but the image becomes saturated and all portions appear light or white

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage contrastVSAvoidimage saturation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The imager is divided into multiple portions (e.g., first imager portion and second imager portion) that can operate independently. One portion is dedicated to reading non-reflective surfaces while another portion handles reflective surfaces, allowing each portion to be optimized for its specific surface type without causing saturation issues in the other

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the imager are assigned different reading modes optimized for specific surface types. The first imager portion uses settings optimized for non-reflective surfaces while the second imager portion uses settings optimized for reflective surfaces, allowing each local region of the imager to have the quality needed for its specific function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If the data reader is configured to read both reflective and non-reflective surfaces, then the versatility is improved, but the resource allocation becomes inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereading mode versatilityVSAvoidresource allocation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The imager is segmented into dedicated portions for different reading modes. The first imager portion is dedicated to non-reflective surfaces while the second imager portion is dedicated to reflective surfaces, allowing efficient resource allocation where each portion operates at full capacity for its specific function without wasting resources on incompatible surface types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The data reader system achieves universality by combining multiple specialized imager portions that can handle different surface types. While each portion is specialized, the overall system can read both reflective and non-reflective surfaces through the coordinated operation of its multi-functional components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If the data reader uses a single imager for both reflective and non-reflective surfaces, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reading reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimager configurationVSAvoidreading reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The imager is divided into multiple portions that can operate independently for different surface types. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high reading reliability by using optimized settings for each surface type while keeping the overall device complexity manageable through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The data reader dynamically switches between different imager portions based on the detected surface type. When a reflective surface is detected, the system activates the second imager portion with appropriate settings, while for non-reflective surfaces it uses the first imager portion, ensuring reliable reading across different conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient and versatile reading of optical codes from various surfaces, including highly reflective electronic devices and non-reflective items, by dynamically adjusting illumination and imager exposure to prevent saturation and ensure sufficient contrast.

Implementation Method 1

optical codes on, or under, a highly, or relatively highly, reflective surface are typically difficult to decode using general-purpose data readers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

it may be advantageous to provide a source of illumination that illuminates the optical code or other scene being imaged, to provide the required signal response in the imaging device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectArtificial illumination: Light Emitting Diode

Data Source

PatentUS9594936B1System and method for improved reading of data from reflective surfaces of electronic devices
Publication Date: 2017.03.14 DATALOGIC USA INC
  • US9594936B1 patent drawing
  • US9594936B1 patent drawing
  • US9594936B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed systems and methods for a data reader operable to capture one or more images from items having a highly, or relatively highly, reflective surface. The data reader includes a controller/processor in operative communication with an imager and an illumination system, where the controller/processor is programmed to selectively operate the imager and the illumination systems to interleave the data reader between a first reading period for reading items having a surface with little or no reflectivity and a second reading period for reading items having a surface with high reflectivity. In some embodiments, the items with highly reflective surfaces may include electronic devices, such as mobile phones.