Imaginary Vehicle Control for Collision-Aware Lane Joining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vehicle control systems struggle to effectively control acceleration/deceleration based on the traveling state of another vehicle, particularly when the speed of the other vehicle exceeds the speed limit, making it difficult to avoid collisions.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle-traveling control system that acquires positional and speed information on the own vehicle and neighboring vehicles, determines a subject vehicle that may collide, generates an imaginary vehicle traveling at an imaginary speed to a collision assumption position, and controls the distance between the own and imaginary vehicles to prevent collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If acceleration/deceleration is controlled toward a decided joining target position, then the own vehicle can join the main lane, but collision avoidance becomes difficult when the subject vehicle speed exceeds the speed limit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelane joining capabilityVSAvoidcollision avoidance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously generating an imaginary vehicle that reaches the collision assumption position at the same time as the subject vehicle would reach it. This imaginary vehicle is generated from a time point before the own vehicle reaches the collision assumption position, allowing the control system to proactively plan acceleration/deceleration commands that prevent collision while maintaining smooth lane joining operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an imaginary vehicle as an intermediary construct that mediates between the own vehicle and the actual subject vehicle. This imaginary vehicle serves as a control target that incorporates both the subject vehicle's trajectory and speed limitations, allowing the control system to issue acceleration/deceleration commands that simultaneously achieve lane joining and collision avoidance, even when the subject vehicle exceeds speed limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Speed

If the subject vehicle speed exceeds the speed limit, then the subject vehicle may reach the collision assumption position faster, but conventional control cannot appropriately control acceleration/deceleration to avoid collision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubject vehicle speedVSAvoidcontrol adaptability to varying speeds
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts to varying subject vehicle speeds by continuously updating the imaginary vehicle's parameters based on real-time subject vehicle speed information. When the subject vehicle exceeds speed limits or changes speed, the imaginary vehicle's trajectory and arrival time are recalculated, enabling the control system to issue appropriate acceleration/deceleration commands that maintain collision avoidance across all speed conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes control parameters by using the imaginary vehicle's speed and position as dynamic control targets rather than fixed parameters. The imaginary vehicle's speed is set based on the subject vehicle's actual speed (even when exceeding limits), and its position is continuously updated to reflect the collision assumption position. This parameter transformation allows the control system to adapt to any subject vehicle speed while maintaining safe operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If collision avoidance control is implemented, then safety is improved, but unnecessary acceleration/deceleration may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoidenergy loss from acceleration/deceleration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback by continuously monitoring the subject vehicle's actual speed and position, then updating the imaginary vehicle's parameters accordingly. The control system issues acceleration/deceleration commands based on the difference between the own vehicle's current state and the imaginary vehicle's target state. This feedback mechanism ensures that collision avoidance control is applied only when necessary and at appropriate magnitudes, minimizing unnecessary energy consumption while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12589738B2Vehicle-traveling control system and vehicle-traveling control method
Publication Date: 2026.03.31 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • US12589738B2 patent drawing
  • US12589738B2 patent drawing
  • US12589738B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is provided a vehicle-traveling control system that can appropriately avoid a collision. A vehicle-traveling control system acquires positional and speed information on an own vehicle, positional and speed information on neighboring vehicles, determines a subject vehicle that travels toward the own vehicle and may collide with the own vehicle, sets a collision assumption position where the own vehicle may collide with the subject vehicle, and continuously generates an imaginary vehicle that reaches the collision assumption position when the subject vehicle reaches there, and issues a command for controlling a distance between the own vehicle and the imaginary vehicle.