Imaging Exam Complexity Prediction for Remote Technologist Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current radiology operations command centers face challenges in efficiently allocating remote expert technologists due to unpredictable image acquisition complexities, which are influenced by local technologist expertise, patient characteristics, and examination specifics, leading to sub-optimal scheduling and potential operational disruptions.

Innovation Solution

A data-driven system assesses the complexity of upcoming medical imaging examinations using historical data and real-time feedback to predict factors contributing to complexity, enabling alerts for local and remote technologists to optimize resource allocation and support requests.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If remote expert technologists are allocated based on traditional scheduling methods, then operational simplicity is maintained, but scheduling efficiency and resource allocation optimization deteriorate due to unpredictable image acquisition complexities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity for complexity assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of image acquisition complexity before the actual scanning begins. By evaluating patient characteristics, examination protocols, and technologist expertise in advance, the system predicts potential complexity issues and enables proactive resource allocation and support scheduling, preventing operational disruptions rather than reacting to them

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where actual examination outcomes and complexity measurements are fed back into the assessment model. This continuous learning process refines the complexity prediction accuracy over time, allowing the system to improve scheduling efficiency while managing complexity through data-driven insights rather than intuitive judgments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If expert technologists monitor multiple imaging bays concurrently, then coverage and support availability are improved, but attention quality and response time to individual bays deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage of multiple imaging baysVSAvoidquality of support provided
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by providing differentiated levels of monitoring and support attention to different imaging bays based on their specific needs. Instead of uniform monitoring, the complexity assessment identifies which bays require intensive attention and allocates expert resources accordingly, ensuring high-quality support where most needed while maintaining broader coverage through automated assessment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The complexity assessment system acts as an intermediary between multiple imaging bays and expert technologists. It processes information from numerous bays, evaluates complexity factors, and translates this into actionable scheduling recommendations, enabling experts to efficiently prioritize their attention without being overwhelmed by the sheer number of concurrent monitoring requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If complex examinations are identified and prepared in advance, then operational disruptions are reduced, but time and computational resources for assessment increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational smoothnessVSAvoidtime for complexity assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by focusing complexity assessment on the most critical factors rather than evaluating every possible variable. It identifies and weighs key determinants of examination complexity such as patient characteristics and protocol complexity, providing sufficient predictive accuracy without requiring exhaustive analysis of all potential影响因素, thus balancing assessment thoroughness with time efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250378931A1Systems and methods for predicting an image acquisition complexity of an imaging examination
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US20250378931A1 patent drawing
  • US20250378931A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus (1) for providing assistance during medical imaging examinations performed in imaging bays (3) using medical imaging devices (2) each having an imaging device controller (10) with a controller display (24′) includes a remote electronic processing device (12) operatively connected to receive data streams (17, 18, 34) from the imaging bay including a screen mirroring data stream (34) that carries content presented on the controller display and provide a natural language communication pathway (19) connecting the imaging bay and the remote electronic processing device. An electronic processor (14s) is programmed to perform a method (100) to assess complexity of an imaging examination identified by a scheduler (40) including acquiring data related to the upcoming medical imaging examination; determining a complexity of the upcoming medical imaging examination based on the acquired data; and outputting an alert (30) indicative of the determined complexity of the upcoming medical imaging examination.