Imaging Lens Focus Group Segmentation for Aberration Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing imaging lenses face challenges in achieving favorable optical performance, particularly in maintaining aberration correction and reducing weight and size while accommodating a small F number and large angle of view.

Innovation Solution

The imaging lens configuration includes a first lens group that remains stationary during focusing, with a second lens group moving, featuring a negative meniscus lens closest to the image side and a positive refractive power, along with specific conditional expressions to optimize lens curvatures and Abbe numbers, ensuring effective aberration correction and reduced weight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If a conventional imaging lens configuration is used, then the lens can achieve basic imaging function, but the weight and size of the focus group increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of focus groupVSAvoidaberration correction
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The lens is divided into a stationary first lens group and a movable second lens group. By segmenting the lens system, the focus group (second lens group) can be made lighter and smaller while the first lens group remains stationary to provide stable aberration correction. This segmentation allows the moving part to be minimized in weight and size while maintaining overall optical performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different lens groups are assigned different functions: the first lens group is optimized for aberration correction with specific curvature and Abbe number requirements, while the second lens group is optimized for focusing with a negative meniscus lens configuration. This local optimization allows each group to perform its function efficiently without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Illumination intensity

If the F number is reduced for better light gathering, then the angle of view increases, but aberration correction becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveF numberVSAvoidaberration correction
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent specifies particular parameter ranges for the lens elements, including curvature radii (rF/Y between 0.7-1.3, (rF-rR)/(rF+rR) between -0.2-0.2) and Abbe numbers (ν1 between 20-50, ν2 between 15-40). These parameter optimizations enable the lens to maintain aberration correction even with reduced F number and increased angle of view.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The second lens group is designed to move during focusing to dynamically adjust the optical path. The negative meniscus lens configuration in the second group allows for dynamic compensation of aberrations that occur at different object distances, enabling maintained performance across varying F numbers and angles of view.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If more lens elements are added to improve optical performance, then aberration correction improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical performanceVSAvoidlens group configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lens is segmented into two functional groups with clear division of labor. The first group handles stationary aberration correction while the second group handles dynamic focusing. This segmentation achieves good optical performance without requiring a large number of separate lens elements, thus controlling device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second lens group serves multiple functions: it provides the primary focusing mechanism and simultaneously contributes to aberration correction through its negative meniscus lens design. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional dedicated correction elements, simplifying the overall lens configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration achieves reduced weight and size of the focus group while maintaining high optical performance, minimizing aberration fluctuations, and supporting a small F number and large angle of view.

Implementation Method 1

a lens closest to the image side in the second lens group is a negative meniscus lens having a surface convex toward the object side

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefraction: Refraction

Data Source

PatentUS20240361576A1Imaging lens and imaging apparatus
Publication Date: 2024.10.31 FUJIFILM CORP
  • US20240361576A1 patent drawing
  • US20240361576A1 patent drawing
  • US20240361576A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The imaging lens includes, successively in order from a position closest to an object side to an image side: a first lens group; and a second lens group that has a positive refractive power. During focusing, only the second lens group moves. A lens closest to the image side in the second lens group is a negative meniscus lens having a surface convex toward the object side. Assuming that a paraxial radius of curvature of an object side surface of the negative meniscus lens closest to the image side in the second lens group is rF, and a maximum image height is Y, the imaging lens satisfies Conditional Expression (1), which is represented by 0.5<rF/Y<3 (1).