Imaging Lens Aberration Correction via Segmented Groups

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional imaging lenses for small cameras, such as smartphones and digital still cameras, face challenges in achieving both downsizing and satisfactory aberration correction, particularly in achieving high resolution while maintaining a short total track length and minimizing size.

Innovation Solution

The imaging lens configuration includes a first lens group with positive refractive power, a second lens group with negative refractive power, and a third lens group with negative refractive power, arranged from the object side to the image plane side, with specific Abbe's number and curvature radius conditions to correct chromatic aberration and field curvature, and includes aspheric surfaces to manage axial and off-axis chromatic aberrations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the number of lenses is increased to achieve high resolution, then the imaging quality is improved, but the total track length and size of the imaging lens increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging resolutionVSAvoidtotal track length
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The imaging lens is divided into three lens groups (first lens group with positive refractive power, second lens group with negative refractive power, and third lens group with negative refractive power) arranged from the object side to the image plane side. This segmentation allows for effective aberration correction while maintaining a compact total track length, resolving the contradiction between achieving high resolution and keeping the lens size small.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If a seven-lens configuration is used to correct aberrations, then the aberration correction is improved, but the device complexity and size increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaberration correctionVSAvoidlens configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent specifies particular parameter ranges for the seven lenses including focal lengths (f1, f2, f3, f4, f5, f6, f7), Abbe's numbers (νd1, νd2, νd3, νd4, νd5, νd6, νd7), and curvature radii (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15). By optimizing these parameters within specific ranges, the patent achieves effective aberration correction while maintaining a manageable device complexity and compact size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Length of stationary object

If the focal length ratio between first lens group and second lens group is adjusted for downsizing, then the total track length is reduced, but the aberration correction becomes insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal track lengthVSAvoidaberration correction
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes specific parameter ranges including 0.3 < f1/f < 0.6, -1.5 < f2/f1 < -0.5, and -3.0 < f4/f5 < -1.0, where f1 is the focal length of the first lens, f2 is the focal length of the second lens, f4 is the focal length of the fourth lens, and f5 is the focal length of the fifth lens. These parameter optimizations enable the patent to achieve both downsizing and satisfactory aberration correction simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Length of stationary object

If the back focal length is reduced for downsizing, then the imaging lens size is decreased, but the space for inserting filters and the correction of astigmatism and field curvature are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging lens sizeVSAvoidastigmatism and field curvature correction
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent specifies that 0.05 < D34/f < 0.2, where D34 is the distance between the third lens and the fourth lens, and f is the focal length of the entire imaging lens. This parameter optimization enables the patent to maintain an appropriate back focal length for filter insertion while achieving effective correction of astigmatism and field curvature in a compact imaging lens.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration allows for a compact imaging lens with improved aberration correction, including chromatic aberration and field curvature, enabling high-resolution imaging while maintaining a small size suitable for portable devices and small cameras.

Implementation Method 1

an imaging lens includes a first lens group having positive refractive power, a second lens group having negative refractive power, and a third lens group having negative refractive power, arranged in the order from the object side to the image plane side

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefraction: Refraction

Implementation Method 2

includes aspheric surfaces to manage axial and off-axis chromatic aberrations

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChromatic aberration correction: Refraction

Data Source

PatentUS10571663B2Imaging lens
Publication Date: 2020.02.25 TOKYO VISIONARY OPTICS CO LTD
  • US10571663B2 patent drawing
  • US10571663B2 patent drawing
  • US10571663B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An imaging lens includes a first lens having positive refractive power; a second lens; a third lens; a fourth lens; a fifth lens; a sixth lens; and a seventh lens having negative refractive power, arranged in this order from an object side to an image plane side. The seventh lens is formed in a meniscus shape near an optical axis thereof. The fourth lens has a specific focal length.