Automated Imaging System Quality Assessment via Test Exam Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current medical imaging systems require time-consuming manual analysis of test exams to assess performance, lacking automated traceability and notification for performance indicators, leading to potential inaccuracies and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

An integrated system that automatically analyzes test exam data from imaging devices, determines validity, and measures performance indicators, providing reports on imaging device functionality over time, with alerts for deviations and storage of performance metrics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual analysis of test exams is performed by technicians/physicists, then performance assessment can be conducted, but the process is time-consuming and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance assessment accuracyVSAvoidtime for quality control tests
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical analysis process performed by technicians with an automated computer-based system that uses algorithms and software to analyze test exam data, measure performance indicators, and generate reports automatically

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The imaging device performs self-assessment by automatically collecting test exam data, processing it through built-in analysis routines, and generating performance reports without requiring external technician intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual quality control tests are performed annually or biannually, then some system parameters can be monitored, but frequent parameters cannot be adequately tested

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging system performance monitoringVSAvoidfrequency of performance testing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system enables continuous monitoring of imaging system performance by automatically analyzing test exams as they are performed, providing ongoing assessment of multiple performance indicators rather than periodic snapshots

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-configures multiple performance indicators and acceptance criteria, automatically measuring and comparing them against thresholds before clinical use, enabling proactive detection of performance degradation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If manual analysis and outsourcing of test exam results are used, then performance evaluation can be achieved, but costs increase and traceability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraceability of performance dataVSAvoidcost of quality assurance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system provides immediate feedback by automatically comparing measured performance indicators against pre-defined acceptance criteria and generating alerts when thresholds are exceeded, creating a closed-loop quality control process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an automated software intermediary that acts as a mediator between test exam data collection and performance assessment, systematically processing data through standardized algorithms to eliminate manual interpretation variability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10786222B2Methods, systems, and apparatus for automatically assessing quality of imaging systems
Publication Date: 2020.09.29 GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC
  • US10786222B2 patent drawing
  • US10786222B2 patent drawing
  • US10786222B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for automatically assessing quality of imaging systems are disclosed. An example apparatus includes a processor configured to receive data from an imaging device; determine whether the received data corresponds to a test exam; in response to determining that the received data corresponds to the test exam, determine whether the test exam was correctly performed based on a comparison of the data to a validity criterion; and when the test exam was correctly performed, determine that the imaging system satisfies a performance criteria based on a comparison of a characteristic of the data corresponding to the performance indicator with a performance threshold; and a storage configured to store the performance indicator in conjunction with the data.