Automated Reason Generation for Imaging Studies

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Radiology imaging study orders often require revision due to misalignment between the reason for the study and the diagnosis, leading to inefficiencies and potential errors in clinical decision-making, which can result in patient dissatisfaction and unreimbursed care services.

Innovation Solution

A framework that employs a two-step summarization method combining extractive and abstractive text summarization techniques, utilizing a reinforcement learning agent and an entity linking system to automatically generate accurate reasons for imaging studies by selecting relevant sentences from a patient's history of present illness and mapping mentions to standardized medical entities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If radiologists manually review physician progress notes to obtain correct reason for study, then accuracy of imaging orders is improved, but time consumption and workflow interruption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of imaging ordersVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically extracting and generating reasons for imaging studies from the electronic medical record using NLP and machine learning models, eliminating the need for radiologists to manually review progress notes while maintaining high accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of radiologist review is replaced with an automated computational system using natural language processing, reinforcement learning, and entity linking to extract and generate imaging study reasons, significantly reducing time consumption while maintaining or improving accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If radiologists manually revise incorrect imaging orders, then error reduction is achieved, but workflow efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror reductionVSAvoidworkflow efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by automatically generating accurate reasons for imaging studies before radiologist review, pre-filtering and preparing the information so that radiologists only need to verify rather than manually search and revise, thereby maintaining error reduction while improving workflow efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the generated reasons are evaluated against the actual diagnosis, and the model is retrained using reinforcement learning with rewards based on entity linking accuracy, continuously improving reliability without increasing manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated systems are used to generate reasons for imaging studies, then productivity is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex task of generating imaging study reasons is segmented into distinct modular components: sentence extraction module, reason generation module, entity linking module, and reinforcement learning training module. Each module handles a specific subtask, making the overall system more manageable and maintainable while achieving high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12148531B2Generating reasons for imaging studies
Publication Date: 2024.11.19 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US12148531B2 patent drawing
  • US12148531B2 patent drawing
  • US12148531B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A framework for generating reasons for imaging studies. An extractor, including a reinforcement learning agent, is trained to select one or more relevant sentences from the training histories of present illness. An abstractor is further pre-trained to generate one or more reasons for study from the one or more relevant sentences. An entity linking system is pre-trained using medical text corpora to map one or more mentions in the one or more reasons for study to one or more standardized medical entities for predicting one or more diagnoses. The reinforcement learning agent may then be re-trained using one or more rewards generated by the entity linking system. One or more reasons for study may be generated from a current history of present illness using the trained extractor, abstractor and entity linking system.