Imbalanced Data Classification Model Selection Framework

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Classifying imbalanced data poses challenges as classification models tend to bias towards the majority class, leading to poor performance in identifying minority classes, and existing methods lack guidance for selecting optimal algorithm combinations for improved results.

Innovation Solution

A system that evaluates different combinations of classification and sampling algorithms using sensitive metrics to select a model that effectively classifies imbalanced data by applying various sampling techniques such as under-sampling, over-sampling, and ensemble methods, and provides a framework for generating classification models that satisfy specific performance criteria.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional classification models are used on imbalanced data, then the model training is simple, but the classification performance on minority class deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification performance on minority classVSAvoidmodel training complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the model selection process into multiple components: different sampling methods (undersampling, oversampling, ensemble methods), multiple classification algorithms, and various metric evaluations. This segmentation allows systematic evaluation of each component's impact on minority class performance without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key parameters including sampling ratios, algorithm configurations, and evaluation metrics to optimize minority class detection. By systematically varying these parameters across multiple model combinations, the system identifies configurations that improve minority class reliability while managing complexity through automated evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple algorithm combinations are tested to find optimal model, then the classification accuracy improves, but the computational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-defining a structured framework of algorithm combinations and evaluation metrics before actual model training. This preliminary setup includes selecting representative sampling methods and classification algorithms, which streamlines subsequent computational efforts and reduces redundant testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where model performance on minority class metrics feeds back into the selection process. By evaluating multiple combinations against specified metrics and using this feedback to identify optimal configurations, the system achieves high accuracy while avoiding exhaustive testing of all possible combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If sampling techniques are applied to balance data, then the minority class detection improves, but the data processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveminority class detectionVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamic sampling techniques that adaptively adjust sampling ratios based on the specific characteristics of the imbalanced data. Rather than using fixed sampling approaches, the system dynamically selects and adjusts sampling parameters to achieve effective minority class representation while minimizing unnecessary processing overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different sampling strategies to different regions of the data space based on local characteristics. By identifying areas where minority class samples are needed most and applying targeted sampling techniques to those regions, the system improves minority class detection without uniformly processing all data, thus reducing overall processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240394714A1Systems and methods for generating models for classifying imbalanced data
Publication Date: 2024.11.28 SYNCHRONY BANK
  • US20240394714A1 patent drawing
  • US20240394714A1 patent drawing
  • US20240394714A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A classification modeling system receives a request to identify a classification model from a set of classification models. The request includes a data set and specifies one or more metrics for evaluating performance of the set of classification models in classifying data from the data set. The system uses the set of classification models to generate a set of classifications and determines the performance of the set of classification models based on the set of classifications and according to the one or more metrics. Based on the performance of the set of classification models, the system selects a classification model and provides the classification model to fulfill the request.