Imbalanced Data Classification With Asymmetric Loss Weighting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine learning models struggle with classifying imbalanced data, where one class significantly outweighs another, leading to biased classification and inefficiency in identifying the minority class.

Innovation Solution

A modified loss function that penalizes false positives and false negatives differently, combined with class-weighted performance structures, stabilizes model training and improves gradient computation efficiency, reducing computational overhead and enhancing model convergence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional loss functions are used for training classification models on imbalanced data, then the model training is simpler and faster, but the classification accuracy for the minority class deteriorates due to bias toward the majority class

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracy for minority classVSAvoidloss function complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making the loss function asymmetric, where different weights are assigned to different classes based on their importance and imbalance ratio. This allows the model to focus more on the minority class during training while maintaining overall training efficiency, thereby improving minority class classification accuracy without requiring complete redesign of the training process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the loss function by introducing class weights and imbalance ratios as adjustable parameters. These parameters can be dynamically modified during training to reflect the actual class distribution and importance, allowing the model to adapt to imbalanced data without fundamentally changing the training architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If class weights are adjusted to improve minority class detection, then classification bias is reduced, but computational overhead increases due to additional gradient computation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performance consistencyVSAvoidcomputational overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selectively applying class weights only to the minority class or to specific samples that are most difficult to classify. This approach reduces the computational overhead compared to reweighting all samples, while still achieving the goal of improving minority class detection and model performance consistency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent ensures continuous useful action by integrating the class-weighted loss computation into the standard gradient descent framework, allowing the model to learn from imbalanced data in a continuous and efficient manner without requiring separate computation passes or additional training stages

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Measurement precision

If traditional metrics like accuracy are used to evaluate model performance, then the evaluation is simpler, but the metrics are less effective in quantifying model quality on imbalanced data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel quality quantificationVSAvoidevaluation metric complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the overall model evaluation into class-specific metrics, where performance is measured separately for each class rather than using a single aggregate accuracy metric. This allows for more precise quantification of model quality on imbalanced data by highlighting performance differences across classes, while maintaining computational efficiency through modular metric calculation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260111897A1Machine learning techniques for classifying imbalanced data
Publication Date: 2026.04.23 SYNCHRONY BANK
  • US20260111897A1 patent drawing
  • US20260111897A1 patent drawing
  • US20260111897A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A transaction classification system obtains a data set including first data associated with a first characteristic and second data associated with a second characteristic. In response to obtaining the data set, the system uses a classification model to generate a classification by classifying the first data into majority data and the second data into minority data. From the classification and using the classification model, the system determines a cost. The system modifies the classification model based on this cost to generate an updated classification model. The system uses the updated classification model to re-classify a subset of the first data into the minority data and a subset of the second data into the majority data.