IMD Header Adhesion via Textured Metal Container

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current implantable medical devices (IMDs) face challenges in achieving strong and reliable connections between the device container and the polymer header, leading to potential failures under side load, due to inadequate adhesion and stress concentrations at the interface.

Innovation Solution

The use of a textured surface on the metallic device container, combined with a thermoset epoxy header, enhances adhesion through surface roughening and specific texturing patterns, and controlled curing processes to achieve high fracture toughness and failure strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a smooth surface is used on the device container, then manufacturing is easier, but adhesion strength between header and container is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesion strengthVSAvoidsurface preparation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The surface roughness parameter of the device container is changed from smooth to textured, with specific roughness values (Ra of 0.5-5.0 micrometers) specified to optimize adhesion strength while maintaining manufacturability through controlled surface treatment processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The textured surface is applied locally at the interface region between the header and device container, providing enhanced adhesion precisely where needed while leaving other surfaces smooth for manufacturing and aesthetic purposes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If a simple attachment interface is used between header and container, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability under side load is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveside load failure strengthVSAvoidattachment interface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A composite attachment interface is created combining the textured metallic device container surface with the thermoset epoxy header material, achieving superior mechanical interlocking and chemical bonding that resists side loads while maintaining a relatively simple overall device structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

Rounded or curved surface features are incorporated into the textured interface geometry, distributing stress more evenly under side loads and preventing stress concentration at sharp corners, thereby enhancing reliability without significantly increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Strength

If a thermoset epoxy header is used, then fracture toughness is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracture toughnessVSAvoidcuring process control
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The curing process parameters of the thermoset epoxy header are precisely controlled, including temperature ranges (typically 60-100°C), humidity levels, and curing duration, to achieve optimal fracture toughness while maintaining manufacturability through standardized process specifications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Surface preparation of the device container is performed in advance before header attachment, including texturing and cleaning processes, to ensure optimal bonding conditions are established before the header is applied and cured, thereby reducing variability and improving manufacturing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution significantly increases the side load failure strength of the IMD by ensuring a strong bond between the header and the device container, reducing the likelihood of failure at the interface and improving the overall durability of the device.

Implementation Method 1

The use of a textured surface on the metallic device container, combined with a thermoset epoxy header, enhances adhesion through surface roughening

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 2

controlled curing processes to achieve high fracture toughness and failure strength

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCuring: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentEP2790779B1Implantable medical device with header comprising an identification tag or antenna attachment feature
Publication Date: 2018.10.03 CARDIAC PACEMAKERS INC
  • EP2790779B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2790779B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2790779B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

Systems and methods for implantable medical devices and headers are described. In an example, an implantable medical device includes a device container including an electronic module within the device container. A header core includes an electronic connection feature electrically coupled to the electronic module within the device container, the electronic connection feature configured to engage with a lead. In some examples, the header core includes a tag holder configured to locate an identification tag in a selected position with respect to the header core. In some examples, the header core includes an antenna attachment feature configured to locate an antenna in a selected position with respect to the header core. A header shell is disposed around the header core and attached to the device container.