Implantable Medical Device Remote Access With Local Control Priority

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high cost and inefficiency of patient sessions for implantable medical devices (IMDs) due to the need for both clinicians and device representatives to be present during information retrieval, programming, and therapy provision, necessitating a more cost-effective and efficient interaction method.

Innovation Solution

A local user system at the clinic, controlled by a clinician, prioritizes local events over remote events from a remote user system, ensuring direct patient interaction and reducing the need for remote user travel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If both a clinician and a device representative are present during patient sessions for IMD information retrieval, programming, and therapy provision, then device operation assurance and patient care quality are improved, but session costs and operational complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice operation assuranceVSAvoidsession operational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the roles and functions of device representatives and clinicians by providing separate remote access interfaces. The device representative can remotely perform programming and information retrieval tasks through a remote user system, while the clinician focuses on patient care at the local user system. This segmentation eliminates the need for both parties to be physically present simultaneously, reducing session complexity while maintaining device operation assurance through remote monitoring and intervention capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If a remote user system is allowed to control the local user system without priority rules, then remote access capability is improved, but patient safety may be compromised due to conflicting control inputs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote access capabilityVSAvoidpatient safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system establishes priority rules in advance that automatically determine which control inputs to process. When a local event is detected, the system preemptively blocks remote events from being processed, and vice versa. This preliminary establishment of control hierarchy ensures that conflicting control inputs cannot simultaneously affect the IMD, thereby maintaining patient safety while preserving full remote access capability when no local user is present.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12484853B2System and method for interacting with an implantable medical device
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 MEDTRONIC INC
  • US12484853B2 patent drawing
  • US12484853B2 patent drawing
  • US12484853B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One example of a system includes a local user system to interact with an implantable medical device and a local input device communicatively coupled to the local user system to generate local events. To operate the local user system, the local user system is to receive local events from the local input device and remote events from a remote user system communicatively coupled to the local user system via a medical device remote access system. The local user system is to process a local event and ignore a remote event in response to receiving a local event and a remote event simultaneously.