IMiD-14 Gene Signature for Plasma Cell Resistance Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for predicting resistance to immunomodulatory derivatives (IMiDs) in patients with plasma cell disorders, such as multiple myeloma, are inadequate due to unclear mechanisms of resistance and lack of specific prognostic markers.

Innovation Solution

Development of a gene expression profile signature (IMiD-14) that identifies patients as sensitive or resistant to IMiD treatment by measuring the normalized expression levels of prognosis-favorable and unfavorable genes, allowing for classification based on a pre-defined threshold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If gene expression profiling is used to predict IMiD resistance, then prediction accuracy is improved, but measurement complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gene expression profile is divided into two distinct sets: prognosis-favorable genes and prognosis-unfavorable genes. This segmentation allows for systematic measurement and comparison, where each set is evaluated separately and then integrated to produce the final IMiD-14 score, thereby managing measurement complexity through structured organization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms complex gene expression data into a simplified one-dimensional IMiD-14 score by normalizing expression levels and calculating the difference between favorable and unfavorable gene sets. This dimensional reduction converts multi-gene complexity into a single predictive metric that maintains accuracy while reducing measurement complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If multiple gene expression levels are measured and normalized, then prediction reliability is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs normalization of gene expression levels as a preliminary step before calculating the final score. By pre-processing the data to account for technical variations and establishing a standardized scale, the method ensures reliable comparisons across samples while streamlining the subsequent calculation process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms raw gene expression levels into normalized values by changing the parameter scale. This parameter transformation allows for meaningful comparison between different genes and samples, improving prediction reliability while enabling efficient processing through standardized mathematical operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10697024B2Methods of determining IMiDS resistance in plasma cell disorders
Publication Date: 2020.06.30 CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY
  • US10697024B2 patent drawing
  • US10697024B2 patent drawing
  • US10697024B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides methods for determining immunomodulatory derivatives (IMiDs) resistance in a subject having a plasma cell disorder.