Immiscible Fluid Heat Transfer With Membrane Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing heat transfer technologies face challenges with corrosive and incompatible fluid additives in heat exchangers, requiring expensive materials or inferior thermal conductivity to prevent corrosion, and fail to effectively recover thermal energy from salt solutions like seawater.

Innovation Solution

The use of immiscible fluids with specific heat capacity matching and omniphobic or hydrophilic membranes for gravity separation after heat transfer, allowing direct heat transfer from a non-corrosive first fluid to a second fluid with additives, and subsequent filtration to isolate additives, thereby minimizing exposure to the heat exchanger.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional heat exchangers are used with corrosive fluid additives, then heat transfer can be achieved, but corrosion and fouling occur requiring expensive materials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrosion resistanceVSAvoidmaterial cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

An immiscible intermediate fluid is introduced between the corrosive brine and the heat exchanger surfaces. This intermediate fluid acts as a mediator that transfers thermal energy from the brine to the heat exchanger without allowing direct contact between the corrosive additives and the heat exchanger materials, thereby preventing corrosion and fouling while enabling efficient heat transfer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The heat transfer process is segmented into two distinct stages: first, heat transfer from the brine to the immiscible intermediate fluid occurs without direct contact with heat exchanger surfaces; second, the intermediate fluid transfers heat to the heat exchanger. This segmentation isolates the corrosive brine from the heat exchanger, allowing use of cost-effective materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of energy

If heat exchangers are exposed to salty water, then heat transfer occurs, but thermal energy recovery is inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal energy recoveryVSAvoidheat transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The immiscible intermediate fluid serves as an intermediary that enables efficient thermal energy recovery from brine. The fluid's immiscibility with brine prevents contamination while its thermal properties facilitate effective heat transfer, allowing recovery of thermal energy that would otherwise be lost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If expensive corrosion-resistant materials are used, then corrosion resistance improves, but thermal conductivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrosion resistanceVSAvoidthermal conductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The immiscible intermediate fluid acts as a thermal intermediary that decouples the requirements for corrosion resistance and thermal conductivity. The heat exchanger can use cost-effective materials with good thermal conductivity since they only contact the non-corrosive intermediate fluid, while the corrosive brine is isolated by the intermediate fluid barrier

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the system have different functional requirements: the intermediate fluid contacts both the brine (requiring chemical inertness) and the heat exchanger (requiring good thermal conductivity). This local differentiation allows optimization of material properties in different zones, using cost-effective materials where thermal conductivity is critical

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances heat transfer efficiency, reduces corrosion, and allows for effective thermal energy recovery, achieving a higher mass flow rate with minimal pressure differential and reduced fouling, while using cost-effective materials.

Implementation Method 1

direct heat transfer from a non-corrosive first fluid to a second fluid with additives

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

heat transfer predominantly for the purpose of vaporizing a constituent of a working fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase change: Phase Change

Implementation Method 3

omniphobic or hydrophilic membranes for gravity separation after heat transfer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity separation: Gravitation

Implementation Method 4

subsequent filtration to isolate additives

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltration: Filter (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS9513042B2Heat exchangerless heat transfer of immiscible fluids
Publication Date: 2016.12.06 GURIN MICHAEL
  • US9513042B2 patent drawing
  • US9513042B2 patent drawing
  • US9513042B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The heat exchangerless membrane system optimizes heat transfer between a set of two immiscible fluids such that the second of the two immiscible fluids having an additive, notably an additive that makes the second fluid corrosive, is infrequently in contact any heat exchangers that would make the heat exchanger subject to corrosion. This membrane system is capable of separating the two immiscible fluids downstream of the heat transfer process, such that heat transfer can repeat the cycle again in an energy efficient manner.