Immunologically Active Compositions for Mucosal Immunity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vaccines and immune modulators face challenges in inducing effective protective immunity, particularly against rapidly mutating pathogens like influenza and HIV, and in overcoming immune escape mechanisms, with traditional vaccines often requiring high antigen doses and struggling with mucosal administration and stability issues.

Innovation Solution

Development of immunologically active compositions comprising antigenic epitopes, pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), and carriers that exclude escape epitopes, along with methods for identifying immune-active molecules, such as those using heparin adsorption and immunoaffinity selection, to induce protective immunity or tolerance, and the use of microparticles as delivery vehicles that can target specific immune cells.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If traditional vaccines use whole pathogens or high antigen doses, then immune coverage is broad, but immune escape mechanisms are activated and tolerance is induced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantigen doseVSAvoidprotective immunity induction
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and isolates specific protective epitopes from whole pathogens, using only the essential immunogenic components that induce protective immunity without triggering immune escape or tolerance mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by designing vaccines with specific epitope compositions tailored to induce Th1 responses in particular tissue compartments (mucosal vs. systemic), using different epitope combinations for different anatomical locations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If vaccines are administered parenterally, then delivery is simple, but mucosal immunity is less pronounced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadministration routeVSAvoidmucosal immune response
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses mucosal adjuvants and delivery systems (such as cholera toxin derivatives, heat-labile toxin, and engineered bacterial vectors) as intermediaries to facilitate antigen delivery to mucosal-associated lymphoid tissues and induce robust mucosal immune responses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical and chemical parameters of vaccine delivery by using mucosal routes (oral, nasal, inhalation) instead of parenteral injection, and by formulating antigens with mucosal-adjuvant complexes that enhance uptake by mucosal antigen-presenting cells

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Force

If innate immune pathways (TLR signaling) are stimulated, then inflammatory response is activated, but additional pathways (NOD, Mindin) are required for effective control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinflammatory responseVSAvoidinfection control
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple immune pathway activation by combining TLR agonists with NOD ligands and Mindin activators in single vaccine formulations, creating synergistic effects that simultaneously engage innate immune pathways for enhanced protective immunity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite adjuvant systems that combine multiple molecular patterns (TLR ligands, NOD agonists, Mindin activators) in defined ratios to simultaneously stimulate multiple innate immune pathways and achieve balanced Th1/Th2 responses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Reliability

If dendritic cells are activated to link innate and adaptive immunity, then immune response is enhanced, but antigen presentation requirements become more specific

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmune response linkageVSAvoidantigen presentation system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the antigen into distinct epitope components that are separately optimized for MHC class I and MHC class II presentation, ensuring efficient activation of both CD8+ and CD4+ T cell responses through dendritic cell processing pathways

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9138467B2Immunologically active compositions
Publication Date: 2015.09.22 STIPKOVITS LASZLO DR
  • US9138467B2 patent drawing
  • US9138467B2 patent drawing
  • US9138467B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention provides a microparticle carrier system comprising of one or more proteins, peptides, nucleic acids, carbohydrates, lipids or other bioactive substances with or without targeting molecules attached. In addition, the invention also provides immune modulatory compositions and methods of eliciting protective immune responses both in uninfected and infected hosts as well as the induction of immune tolerance.