Impact Mechanism Idle-Strike Damper Arrangement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hammer drills and chipping hammers face issues with idle strikes when the pressing force is low, leading to full impact energy being absorbed by the hammer and tool fitting, causing excessive force peaks and vibration, which can damage downstream components.

Innovation Solution

An additional idle-strike damper element is introduced between the tool fitting and the guide housing, working in conjunction with a rebound-strike damper element to reduce the anvil's return speed and distribute impact energy, allowing the tool fitting to be mounted in a floating manner and attenuate a significant part of the impact energy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If an idle-strike damper element is used to protect downstream components from force peaks, then the components are protected from excessive forces, but the anvil return speed increases and the hammer deactivation behavior is affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce peaks on downstream componentsVSAvoidanvil return speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The damping function is segmented into two separate damper elements: the first idle-strike damper element (11) acts between the anvil and tool fitting, while the second idle-strike damper element (31) acts between the tool fitting and guide housing. This segmentation allows each damper to handle specific portions of the impact energy, with the second damper specifically targeting the tool fitting to reduce its load without excessively increasing anvil return speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the tool fitting is made floating to reduce load, then impact energy is attenuated, but the structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload on tool fittingVSAvoidimpact mechanism structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tool fitting (50) is positioned within the guide housing (80) and made movable in the axial direction, creating a nested arrangement where the tool fitting can float within the guide housing. This nesting allows the tool fitting to move independently to absorb impact energy while maintaining a compact overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The second idle-strike damper element (31) acts as an intermediary between the tool fitting (50) and the guide housing (80), providing a controlled compliance that allows the tool fitting to move floatingly to attenuate impact energy while preventing excessive movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If additional damper elements are added to reduce impact energy, then the load on tool fitting is reduced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact energyVSAvoidnumber of damper elements
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The damping system is segmented into multiple functional zones: the first idle-strike damper element (11) handles the initial impact between anvil and tool fitting, while the second idle-strike damper element (31) handles the subsequent impact between tool fitting and guide housing. This segmentation allows distributed energy absorption across multiple components rather than relying on a single oversized damper.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces the load on the tool fitting and downstream components by minimizing the anvil's return speed and distributing the impact energy effectively, thereby protecting the components from excessive force peaks and vibrations.

Implementation Method 1

Idle-strike damping by the idle-strike damper element influences the return speed of the anvil after an idle strike... the additional idle-strike damper element that acts between the tool fitting and the guide housing is compressed, and so the anvil is accelerated back only to a comparatively minor extent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

rebound-strike damper elements, which are preferably in the form of elastomer damping elements, are used in order to keep force peaks on downstream components and vibrations as low as possible

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHysteresis damping: Hysteresis

Data Source

PatentUS20240424651A1Impact mechanism arrangement
Publication Date: 2024.12.26 HILTI AG
  • US20240424651A1 patent drawing
  • US20240424651A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Hammer drill and/or chipping hammer (100) having a drive motor (70), an impact mechanism (10) and a tool fitting (50) for fitting a tool (110), wherein the impact mechanism (10) has an anvil (30) that is axially displaceable in an anvil guide (20) and acts on the tool (110), wherein the impact mechanism (10) has an idle-strike damper element (11), which acts between the anvil (30) and the tool fitting (50), and wherein the impact mechanism has a guide housing (80), which engages at least partially around the anvil (30) and/or the tool fitting (50), wherein an additional idle-strike damper element (31) is provided, which acts between the tool fitting (50) and the guide housing (80).