Impact Detection System Using Structural Properties

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional sensor systems in factory or warehouse environments often generate false alarms from non-damaging collisions with structures, failing to accurately detect impacts that could cause damage to racking units or barrier systems.

Innovation Solution

An impact detection system comprising a memory to store properties of a structure, a sensor unit to detect movement and generate movement data, and a processor to determine if an impact has occurred based on the movement data and structural properties, providing accurate information about the impact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional sensor systems are used to detect collisions, then collision detection capability is provided, but false alarms are generated from non-damaging collisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of impact detectionVSAvoiddistinction between damaging and non-damaging impacts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameters used for impact assessment by incorporating structural properties (material composition, geometry, thickness) alongside movement data. This multi-parameter approach enables differentiation between damaging and non-damaging impacts, resolving the contradiction between detection reliability and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The processor acts as an intermediary that synthesizes movement data from sensor units with stored structural properties to determine whether an impact is damaging. This intermediary analysis layer filters out false alarms by contextualizing raw sensor data within the structural characteristics of the monitored object.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If only movement data is used for impact detection, then detection simplicity is maintained, but accuracy in determining impact severity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact severity assessmentVSAvoiddata processing requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Structural properties are stored in advance in the memory unit before impact events occur. This preliminary preparation of reference data allows the processor to quickly compare actual impact movements against expected structural characteristics, improving severity assessment accuracy without adding complex real-time processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a multi-functional approach where the same sensor units and processor that detect movement also assess impact severity by integrating structural property data. This universal system performs both simple detection and complex assessment functions, improving measurement precision without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If conventional sensor systems generate alarms for all collisions, then all potential impacts are flagged, but resource efficiency is reduced due to false alarms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoidenergy wasted on false alarm responses
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously comparing sensor data with stored structural properties to determine whether an impact warrants an alarm. This feedback mechanism filters out non-damaging collisions, maintaining comprehensive detection coverage while preventing false alarms that would waste energy on unnecessary responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The alarm generation criterion changes from a simple movement threshold to a multi-parameter assessment combining movement data with structural properties. This parameter change enables the system to maintain high detection coverage while selectively triggering alarms only for genuinely damaging impacts, reducing energy waste from false alarms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system improves the reliability and accuracy of impact detection, reducing false alarms and providing detailed information on impact severity, probability of damage, and expected lifetime of structures, enabling timely maintenance and repair.

Implementation Method 1

a sensor unit to detect movement of the structure and generate movement data

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcceleration detection: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS20250052630A1Impact detection system
Publication Date: 2025.02.13 A-SAFE HQ LTD
  • US20250052630A1 patent drawing
  • US20250052630A1 patent drawing
  • US20250052630A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An impact detection system includes: a memory configured to store at least one property of a structure; a sensor unit configured to detect movement of the structure and to generate movement data; and a processor configured to: receive the movement data from the sensor unit; determine, based on the movement data, whether an impact to the structure has occurred; and determine, based upon determining that the impact has occurred, the information about the impact based on the movement data and the at least one property of the structure.