Impact Hardness Tester Actuator and Reed Switch Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional hardness testing devices using impact mechanisms are either physically demanding for operators due to high energy storage requirements or require additional mechanical triggers, leading to unreliable results and complexity, especially when used by robotic arms.

Innovation Solution

A hardness measurement apparatus with a single-motion actuator for loading and releasing the impact body, incorporating a reed switch for low-power operation and mode switching, allowing reduced user effort and increased convenience, and integrating electronics for compact, low-power consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If a spring is used to supply impact energy and is charged to maximum pressure, then the impact energy is sufficient for hardness measurement, but the operator is physically stressed and results become unreliable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact energyVSAvoidmeasurement reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The device is divided into separate functional components: a spring mechanism for energy storage and an actuator for controlled release. The actuator segments the loading operation from the impact delivery, allowing the spring to be pre-charged without requiring the operator to maintain continuous physical stress during measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An actuator serves as an intermediary between the operator and the spring mechanism. Instead of the operator directly managing the high-pressure spring, they operate the actuator which then controls the spring's energy release, reducing physical stress while maintaining measurement reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If a separate trigger mechanism is added to release the impact body, then operator stress is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator comfortVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator combines multiple functions into a single mechanism: it loads the spring, controls the release of the impact body, and returns the system to its initial state. This merging of functions reduces the number of separate components compared to having distinct loading and triggering mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator serves multiple purposes within the device: it compresses the spring during loading, controls the release of the impact body during operation, and facilitates the return to the initial position. This multi-functionality reduces overall device complexity while improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If traditional mechanical triggering is used, then the device can be operated, but power consumption increases and low-power operation is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational capabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional continuous-power mechanical triggering systems with a low-power actuator mechanism that can be operated with minimal energy input. The actuator uses mechanical advantage and spring energy storage to achieve high-impact force from low-operating-power inputs, enabling both operational capability and low power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus reduces operator stress and complexity by enabling easier operation with lower force requirements and lower power consumption, enhancing reliability and usability for both human and robotic operators.

Implementation Method 1

impacting an impact body against the sample and measuring a parameter of the rebound of the impact body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force: Impact Force

Implementation Method 2

measuring a parameter of the rebound of the impact body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic recovery: Elastic Recovery

Implementation Method 3

The majority of the impact devices use a spring to supply the impact energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring energy storage: Spring

Implementation Method 4

the spring is charged to maximum spring pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 5

incorporating a reed switch for low-power operation and mode switching

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field detection: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS8074496B2Apparatus for hardness measurement by impact
Publication Date: 2011.12.13 BRANDESTINI MARCO
  • US8074496B2 patent drawing
  • US8074496B2 patent drawing
  • US8074496B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The apparatus comprises an actuator (23) that can be pushed from an extended position to a depressed position. When doing so, the actuator (23) first releases an impact body (32) to impinge against the sample (2), and then a catcher (40, 42) to be moved to the released impact body (32) for bringing it back. The passage of the impact body (32) is detected by a reed switch (28), which wakes up the processing circuitry and switches the same between two modes of operation. In the first mode, the circuitry displays a device status, and in the second mode a measuring result.