Impact Processing for Mummy Nut Devitalisation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The almond industry in Australia faces significant economic damage from the Carpophilus beetle, which breeds in mummy nuts and attacks the following crop, necessitating improved orchard hygiene strategies.

Innovation Solution

An impact processing system with a central feed opening, rotatable impact mechanism, and impact structure with holes, capable of fragmenting and devitalizing organic matter, including a rotatable set of impact members to enhance fragmentation and airflow, is used to mechanically process nuts or fruits, thereby reducing their viability as beetle habitats.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If mummy nuts are left in the orchard, then orchard hygiene deteriorates and beetle populations increase, but mechanical removal and destruction requires additional equipment and operational complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeetle population and orchard hygieneVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple functions into a single integrated machine: collection of mummy nuts from the orchard floor, transport to the processing system, and impact fragmentation/devitalisation. This merging eliminates the need for separate removal and destruction operations, reducing overall equipment complexity while effectively addressing beetle habitat issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The impact processing system is designed to handle multiple types of organic matter (mummy nuts, weed seeds, crop residues) through a single device. The rotor with impact elements and screen structure provides universal processing capability, allowing the same equipment to address different orchard hygiene problems without requiring specialized tools for each task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If impact processing system is used to fragment organic matter, then beetle habitat viability is reduced, but energy consumption increases due to high-speed rotating elements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeetle habitat viabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The impact processing system uses a screen with multiple holes to segment the fragmentation process. Material is broken into smaller pieces that pass through the screen holes, allowing the system to achieve effective devitalisation without requiring excessive force or energy. The segmentation enables progressive size reduction rather than attempting to pulverize all material simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adjusts operational parameters including rotor speed, impact element configuration, and screen hole size to optimize energy efficiency. By changing these parameters, the system achieves effective fragmentation and devitalisation of organic matter while minimizing energy consumption, adapting to different types and volumes of material processed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If high impact speeds are used to pulverise material, then fragmentation effectiveness is improved, but device wear and maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefragmentation effectivenessVSAvoidmaintenance requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The impact elements are designed to be replaceable and removable, allowing dynamic maintenance without replacing the entire rotor assembly. The screen structure is also designed for easy removal and replacement. This dynamic maintenance approach enables quick repairs and reduces downtime while maintaining high fragmentation effectiveness during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The impact elements and screen are designed as wear-prone, easily replaceable components rather than permanent fixtures. These components can be quickly swapped out when worn, using inexpensive replacement parts. This approach prioritizes operational continuity and cost-effectiveness over long-term durability of individual components, reducing overall maintenance complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively devitalizes and fragments organic matter, making it less viable as a habitat for insects, thereby reducing beetle populations and improving orchard hygiene.

Implementation Method 1

the rotatable impact mechanism being arranged to impact material entering the primary impact zone from the central opening and accelerate the impacted material in a radial outward direction toward the impact structure to effect fragmentation of the impacted material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS20250228161A1Impact processing system and a machine and a method of improving nut or fruit orchard hygiene
Publication Date: 2025.07.17 SEED TERMINATOR HLDG PTY LTD
  • US20250228161A1 patent drawing
  • US20250228161A1 patent drawing
  • US20250228161A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An impact processing system 10 having a central opening 12 enabling material flow into a primary impact zone 14 in which is located an impact mechanism 16 rotatable about a rotation axis 18. An impact structure 20 provided with a plurality of holes 22 surrounds the impact mechanism 16. The rotatable impact mechanism 16 impacts material entering the primary impact zone 14 from the central opening 12 and accelerate the impacted material in a radial outward direction toward the impact structure 20 to effect fragmentation of the impacted material so that when sufficiently fragmented the material is able to pass through the holes 22. An optional outer structure 30 is radially spaced from the impact structure 20 and may comprise one or more segments that cumulatively extend about the axis of rotation 18 for an angle from 30° and 270° inclusive. A rotatable set of impact members 50 may be located between the impact structure and the outer structure. One or more gaps 28 may be provided in the impact structure 20 to allow the passage of large and/or hard objects that cannot otherwise be fragmented. The outer structure 30 is positioned to span across the gaps 28 so that material passing there thought is directed onto the outer structure 30.