Impact Tool Anvil Support and Sleeve Structure for Low Vibration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing impact drivers face issues with a long manipulatable sleeve length due to fall-out prevention mechanisms and anvil rattling during rotation, leading to increased overall length and vibration of the tool.

Innovation Solution

A tool holding apparatus with a manipulatable sleeve that uses a flat spring to bias balls into a protruding position, preventing them from falling out, and an axial support structure with dual ball bearings to reduce anvil rattling, allowing for a more compact design and minimized vibration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a fall out prevention part is added to cover the balls, then the balls are prevented from falling out, but the manipulatable sleeve becomes longer in the axial direction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveball retentionVSAvoidmanipulatable sleeve length
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The fall out prevention function is moved from the axial dimension (lengthening the sleeve) to the radial dimension (adding a protruding part that extends radially to cover the balls). This dimensional shift allows ball retention without increasing the axial length of the manipulatable sleeve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The fall out prevention function is separated from the manipulatable sleeve body and implemented as a distinct protruding part. This segmentation allows the sleeve to maintain its compact axial length while the protruding part provides the necessary ball coverage when engaged.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If a manipulatable sleeve with fall out prevention is used, then ball retention is improved, but the output shaft protrusion length cannot be shortened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveball retentionVSAvoidoutput shaft protrusion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The ball retention mechanism uses radial extension (protruding part) rather than axial extension, which decouples the retention function from the output shaft protrusion length. This allows the output shaft to be shortened axially while maintaining ball retention through radial coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of operation

If a bearing is used to support the anvil, then the anvil is axially supported, but clearance is created causing anvil rattling during rotation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanvil supportVSAvoidanvil rotation stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

A damping element is introduced between the anvil and bearing to beforehand cushion and absorb the rattling vibrations that occur during rotation. This pre-positioned damping element mitigates the instability caused by bearing clearance before it can cause excessive vibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Ease of operation

If the manipulatable sleeve is made longer to ensure stroke, then the sleeve can move fully, but the overall tool length increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesleeve strokeVSAvoidoverall tool length
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The sleeve stroke function is maintained through radial movement capability rather than increasing axial length. The protruding part provides the necessary stroke while extending radially, keeping the overall tool length compact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables a shorter output shaft protrusion and reduced anvil vibration, resulting in a more compact tool with improved operational stability and reduced vibration of the bit.

Implementation Method 1

An elastic body biases the ball toward the protruding position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the manipulatable sleeve has a length such that at least a portion of the elastic body is exposed when the sleeve is moved to the other position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical Containment: Physical Containment

Data Source

PatentUS11192223B2Tool holding apparatus and power tool, and impact tool
Publication Date: 2021.12.07 MAKITA CORP
  • US11192223B2 patent drawing
  • US11192223B2 patent drawing
  • US11192223B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An impact tool (1; 1A) includes a spindle (12) rotated by a motor (10) and a hammer (70) held by the spindle. The hammer is designed to impact an anvil (14) in a rotational direction. A case (8) houses the hammer. A first bearing (78A) and a second bearing (78B) are held in the case and arranged along the axial direction. The first bearing and the second bearing directly hold the anvil in a rotatable manner.