Impact Tool Drive Assembly Torque Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Impact tools face a challenge in balancing torque capability with size and weight, where increasing the moment of inertia to enhance rotational kinetic energy either results in a larger and heavier tool or sacrifices torque capability.

Innovation Solution

The drive assembly includes a hammer and spring that are rotationally unitized for co-rotation, increasing the effective moment of inertia without adding size or weight, by using a spring with tabs and grooves to maintain rotational alignment and energy storage during operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If the moment of inertia is increased to enhance rotational kinetic energy, then torque capability is improved, but the tool becomes larger and heavier

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque capabilityVSAvoidtool weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The spring is rotationally unitized to the hammer for co-rotation, merging two separate rotating components into a unified system. This combination increases the effective moment of inertia without requiring additional separate components, thereby enhancing torque capability while avoiding increased tool weight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The spring is configured to be both axially movable and rotationally unitized to the hammer, creating a dynamic component that performs dual functions. The spring can compress axially to store/release energy while simultaneously rotating with the hammer to contribute to moment of inertia, optimizing performance without adding weight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Force

If the moment of inertia is increased to enhance rotational kinetic energy, then torque capability is improved, but the tool size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque capabilityVSAvoidtool size
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The spring is rotationally unitized to the hammer for co-rotation, merging two separate rotating components into a unified system. This combination increases the effective moment of inertia without requiring additional separate components, thereby enhancing torque capability while avoiding increased tool size

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The spring serves multiple functions: it provides axial biasing force to separate the hammer from the anvil, stores and releases energy during operation, and simultaneously rotates with the hammer to contribute to moment of inertia. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate components, maintaining compact tool size while improving torque capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Force

If the spring is rotationally unitized to the hammer for co-rotation, then output torque potential increases, but current draw increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput torque potentialVSAvoidcurrent draw
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The spring is pre-biased in a compressed state to store energy before each impact cycle. This preliminary energy storage reduces the energy demand during actual operation, as the spring releases stored energy rather than requiring all energy to be supplied continuously by the motor, thereby reducing current draw while maintaining high torque output

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration increases the output torque potential by 7.34% to 37% while maintaining the tool's size and weight, though it may increase current draw, which can be mitigated with optimized motor design.

Implementation Method 1

a spring for biasing the hammer in an axial direction toward the anvil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The spring is rotationally unitized to the hammer for co-rotation therewith at all times during operation of the impact tool

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMoment of Inertia: Moment of Inertia

Data Source

PatentUS10471573B2Impact tool
Publication Date: 2019.11.12 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORP
  • US10471573B2 patent drawing
  • US10471573B2 patent drawing
  • US10471573B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An impact tool includes a housing, a motor supported in the housing, and a drive assembly for converting a continuous torque input from the motor to consecutive rotational impacts upon a workpiece. The drive assembly includes an anvil, a hammer that is both rotationally and axially movable relative to the anvil, and a spring for biasing the hammer in an axial direction toward the anvil. The spring is rotationally unitized to the hammer for co-rotation therewith at all times during operation of the impact tool.