Impactor Mechanism for High-Force VR Surgery Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current virtual reality (VR) surgery simulation systems with force feedback struggle to accurately replicate the high-force manipulations required for procedures like hip surgery, as serial manipulators often fail to reconcile finer movements with excessive force inputs.

Innovation Solution

A novel impactor mechanism featuring a base with a spherical joint and shock absorption devices, allowing for rotational and translational degrees of freedom, equipped with sensors to measure orientation and force, enabling precise and realistic simulations in VR surgery systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If serial manipulators with motors and transmission are used to provide force feedback, then accuracy and bandwidth are improved, but the system cannot handle high-force manipulations required for procedures like acetabular cup impaction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce feedback accuracyVSAvoidcapability to handle high-force manipulations
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into two separate manipulators: a first serial manipulator dedicated to providing accurate force feedback for fine movements, and a second parallel manipulator dedicated to handling high-force impact operations. This segmentation allows each manipulator to be optimized for its specific function without compromise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A coupling mechanism serves as an intermediary between the two manipulators, allowing them to work together as a coordinated system. The coupling mechanism enables the parallel manipulator to provide high-force impact while the serial manipulator maintains accurate force feedback and positioning control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If smaller components are used in serial manipulators to provide high bandwidth force feedback, then accuracy is improved, but the system lacks the structural robustness for high-force impact operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefine movement accuracyVSAvoidstructural robustness for high-force operations
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates fine movement control from high-force impact operations by using two different manipulator types. The serial manipulator with smaller precision components handles positioning and force feedback, while the parallel manipulator with larger robust components handles impact forces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the system have different structural qualities optimized for their specific functions: the serial manipulator has precision-engineered smaller components for accurate control, while the parallel manipulator has robust larger components for withstanding high forces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If a single manipulator system is used to perform both fine movements and high-force impact, then device complexity is reduced, but the system cannot simultaneously achieve precision and high-force capability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of manipulatorsVSAvoiddual capability for fine movement and high-force impact
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Two different manipulator systems are merged into a single integrated surgical system through a coupling mechanism. This allows the system to achieve capabilities that would be impossible with a single manipulator type alone

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The impactor mechanism provides a robust and realistic simulation of high-force manipulations, enhancing the accuracy and realism of VR surgery training by accurately tracking and responding to impact forces and orientations, thus improving surgical skill development.

Implementation Method 1

The joint is a spherical joint, the spherical joint being a rod end bearing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpherical joint: Gimbal

Implementation Method 2

The at least one shock absorption device is at least one coil spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3714448B1Impactor mechanism for virtual reality surgery simulation system and telesurgery
Publication Date: 2023.12.20 CEDAROME CANADA INC
  • EP3714448B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3714448B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3714448B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An impactor mechanism for virtual or telepresence surgery comprises a base. An impactor shaft has a first end and a second end, a handle portion being provided at the second end. A rotational joint(s) is between the first end of the impactor shaft and the base, the joint providing two or more rotational degrees of freedom to the impactor shaft. Sensors are in the impactor mechanism for measuring an orientation of the impactor shaft relative to the base, and for measuring at least an impact force on the impactor shaft, for use in virtual surgery.