Impalement Hazard Cap With Plunger Lock

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing impalement hazard protective caps are ineffective due to degradation of static fasteners and easy removal from hazards, particularly when subjected to repeated use or contact with objects, leading to inadequate protection against impalement injuries.

Innovation Solution

A mechanically secured impalement hazard protective cap featuring a housing with a flange and body, incorporating a plunger mechanism that engages with a screw to securely attach to various shapes and sizes of impalement hazards, utilizing durable materials like metal or puncture-resistant plastics to enhance stability and prevent accidental removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a friction fit mechanism is used to attach the cap to the impalement hazard, then the cap can be easily installed and removed, but the cap becomes easily dislodged and provides unreliable protection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of installationVSAvoidretention reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cap transitions from a static friction fit to a dynamic positive engagement system. The plunger mechanism allows the cap to be easily installed by simply pushing it onto the hazard, then automatically engages through a cam action that locks the cap in place. This dynamic engagement provides both ease of installation and secure retention, resolving the contradiction between easy operation and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The retention function is extracted from the installation process. The cap installs via simple friction fit (easy operation) but then uses a separate plunger engagement mechanism (taken out as distinct function) to provide secure retention. This separation allows the cap to be easily installed while simultaneously providing reliable protection against dislodgement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If a static fastener is used to secure the cap to the impalement hazard, then the cap can be securely attached, but the fastener degrades through repeated use and foreign objects can interfere with engagement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment securityVSAvoidservice life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The plunger mechanism is self-actuating and requires no external fasteners that can degrade. When the cap is placed on the hazard, the plunger automatically engages through cam action, creating a positive lock that is self-maintaining. The engagement surfaces are designed to be simple and robust, resistant to degradation from repeated use or contamination by foreign objects, thereby extending service life while maintaining attachment security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The attachment system is segmented into distinct functional elements: the cap body, the plunger, and the engagement surfaces. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function - the plunger for engagement, the cam for locking action - and makes the system more resistant to degradation from foreign objects compared to a single complex fastener mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If the cap design accommodates multiple sizes and shapes of impalement hazards, then the cap provides versatile protection, but the attachment mechanism becomes less secure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard compatibilityVSAvoidengagement security
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cap is designed with a universal engagement mechanism that works across multiple hazard types. The plunger and cam system creates a consistent locking action regardless of the specific hazard shape or size, allowing one cap design to securely attach to various impalement hazards while maintaining reliable engagement through the standardized positive lock mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The cap accommodates different hazard parameters (sizes and shapes) while maintaining constant engagement security through the plunger-cam mechanism. The engagement geometry and locking force remain consistent across applications, allowing the cap to adapt to various hazards without compromising the reliability of the attachment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240301708A1Impalement hazard protective cap
Publication Date: 2024.09.12 MARSHALL JEFFREY
  • US20240301708A1 patent drawing
  • US20240301708A1 patent drawing
  • US20240301708A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A protective cap to cover impalement hazards, by means of increasing the surface area associated with said hazard may include utilizing a metal plate embedded within a plastic/polymer cap, with a flat top and a receiving shaft housing below, with mechanical means of securing the cap to said hazard with a mechanical plunger. The mechanical plunger is driven from the exterior of the housing by means of rotating a threaded shaft to selectively engage the impalement hazard and compressively hold the protective cap to the impalement hazard.