Impeller Blade Mistuning for Resonance Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing impeller designs in turbomachinery face challenges in controlling resonance response amplification due to random mistuning, especially in wide operating ranges like aircraft engines, where the desired advantage of reduced vibration is not consistently achieved.

Innovation Solution

The impeller design incorporates a rotatable hub with blades arranged in an alternating pattern of first and second blades, each with distinct vibrational eigenvalues, ensuring a mistune distribution that avoids Fourier components with wave numbers twice the nodal diameter number, thereby suppressing resonance response amplification across notable rotational orders.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If blades are designed with small thickness to reduce weight and increase efficiency, then weight reduction and efficiency improvement are achieved, but the risk of damage due to high cycle fatigue increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade weightVSAvoidfatigue damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the vibrational eigenvalue parameter of specific blades (making them different from the common value) to alter the resonance response characteristics of the entire blade set, thereby reducing fatigue damage risk while maintaining thin blade design for weight reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If intentional mistuning is applied to reduce resonance response amplification, then vibration reduction is achieved in specific resonance conditions, but the effectiveness is limited to defined blade configurations and operating conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration responseVSAvoidapplicability across operating ranges
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different vibrational eigenvalues to specific blades (first blades with first eigenvalue, second blades with second eigenvalue) rather than uniform mistuning, creating localized variations that collectively reduce resonance response across multiple operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces asymmetry by deliberately creating non-uniform distribution of blade vibrational eigenvalues, where certain blades have different eigenvalues from others, breaking the symmetry of the tuned system to reduce resonance amplification across various rotational orders

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional intentional mistuning strategies are used to lower resonance amplification factor below 1.0, then response reduction is achieved at two nodal diameter mode and rotational secondary harmonic frequency, but unexpected response amplifications may occur due to harmonic resonance induced by stationary blades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresonance amplification factorVSAvoidharmonic resonance control
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the vibrational eigenvalue parameter of specific blades to create a mistune distribution that addresses multiple resonance conditions simultaneously, including harmonic resonances induced by stationary blades, rather than optimizing for a single resonance condition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design effectively suppresses the increase in resonance response amplification factor during harmonic resonance of notable rotational orders, regardless of the impeller's configuration or vibration modes, thereby enhancing durability and reducing vibration.

Implementation Method 1

the resonance response amplification factor (AF) of each blade may differ from one another

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResonance: Resonance

Implementation Method 2

blade vibration response and intentional mistuning are greatly dependent on the blade configuration and aerodynamic conditions during impeller operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS12281596B2Method for manufacturing impeller
Publication Date: 2025.04.22 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US12281596B2 patent drawing
  • US12281596B2 patent drawing
  • US12281596B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an impeller comprising a rotatable hub and a plurality of blades provided circumferentially on the rotatable hub at regular intervals, the blades including first blades each having a first vibrational eigenvalue and second blades each having a second vibrational eigenvalue, the first blades and the second blades are circumferentially arranged with a predetermined regularity in a circumferential direction in an alternating manner and with a mistune distribution that does not include a mistune component having a wavenumber twice a number of nodal diameters computed fromH+ND=nN where H is a rotational order of resonance under harmonic forced vibration, ND is a nodal diameter number in a traveling wave mode, n is an integer and N is a number of the blades.