Impeller Clamping Assembly for Centrifugal Compressor Shaft Deflection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In multi-stage centrifugal compressors, impeller deformation due to thrust loads causes operational vibration and noise, and the tolerance stack-up effect leads to rotating imbalances, which existing technologies fail to adequately address.

Innovation Solution

A clamping assembly is used that includes a relatively stiff support for the front side of the impeller to relieve deflection and a relatively flexible support for the backside to compensate for thermal expansion, comprising a locknut and a spring member, such as a Belleville washer, to independently support each impeller and reduce shaft deflection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If impellers are mounted on a shaft without individual clamping, then the structure is simpler, but impeller deformation due to thrust loads causes operational vibration and noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclamping assembly structureVSAvoidvibration and noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the support function into separate clamping assemblies for each impeller, with individual stiff and flexible supports for each impeller backside, rather than a single collective support structure. This segmentation allows each impeller to be independently supported, reducing vibration and noise while maintaining manageable complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different support characteristics at different locations: a relatively stiff support structure for the front side of each impeller to resist thrust loads, and a relatively flexible support structure for the backside to accommodate thermal expansion and reduce deformation. This local differentiation of support rigidity addresses the vibration problem effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If impellers are mounted without clamping, then the assembly is easier, but tolerance stack-up effect leads to rotating imbalances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpeller assembly processVSAvoidrotating balance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The clamping assemblies are pre-installed on the shaft before impeller mounting, establishing fixed reference positions. This preliminary action eliminates the need for complex post-assembly adjustments and ensures precise positioning of each impeller, thereby reducing tolerance stack-up effects and improving rotating balance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The clamping assemblies act as intermediary components between the shaft and impellers, providing precise positioning and alignment. These intermediaries compensate for manufacturing tolerances in both the shaft and impellers, ensuring accurate relative positioning without requiring extremely tight manufacturing tolerances on the impellers themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Stability of the object's composition

If a stiff support is used for the front side of the impeller, then deflection is reduced, but thermal expansion compensation is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpeller deflectionVSAvoidthermal expansion compensation
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different support rigidity characteristics at different locations: a relatively stiff support structure for the front side of each impeller to resist thrust loads and reduce deflection, and a relatively flexible support structure for the backside to accommodate thermal expansion. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between stability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The support system transitions from a static, uniformly rigid structure to a dynamic system with differentiated rigidity characteristics. The flexible backside support allows the impeller to dynamically adjust to thermal expansion while the stiff front support maintains operational stability during compression cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Device complexity

If multiple impellers are assembled without individual clamping, then the device is simpler, but shaft deflection increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupporting assemblyVSAvoidshaft deflection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of a single collective support structure, the patent segments the support function into multiple independent clamping assemblies, each with its own stiff and flexible support components. This segmentation allows each impeller to be independently supported, preventing load accumulation that would cause shaft deflection while keeping each individual clamping assembly relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies support action at multiple discrete locations along the shaft rather than relying on a single support point. By distributing the support action across multiple clamping assemblies positioned at different locations, the system provides sufficient total support to prevent shaft deflection without requiring any single support component to be overly complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces the tolerance stack-up effect and vibration by distributing the thrust load effectively, allowing for a tighter interference fit and improved stability of the impellers, thereby minimizing shaft deflection and operational noise.

Implementation Method 1

the relatively flexible support may include a spring member configured to provide a relatively flexible support to the backside of the impeller, which can help compensate for, e.g., thermal expansion/contraction of the impeller

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the spring member may include a conical washer such as, but not limited to, a Belleville washer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 3

the relatively flexible support may include a spring member configured to provide a relatively flexible support to the backside of the impeller

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11225973B2Systems and methods to clamp an impeller to a compressor shaft
Publication Date: 2022.01.18 TRANE INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US11225973B2 patent drawing
  • US11225973B2 patent drawing
  • US11225973B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods to clamp an impeller on a shaft in a centrifugal compressor. The embodiments as disclosed herein may include clamping individual impeller independently to the shaft, which may reduce the tolerance stack-up effect of a plurality of impellers. The impeller can be clamped to the shaft by positioning, for example, a relatively stiff support (e.g. a shaft locknut) on a front side of the impeller. The impeller can also be clamped to the shaft by a relatively flexible support to compensate for e.g. thermal expansion/contraction of the impeller. The embodiments as disclosed herein are particularly suitable for a multi-stage impeller.