Rocket Turbopump Impeller Hub Coolant Passage for Housing Cooling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional rocket engine manufacturing techniques are complex and costly, involving intricate assembly procedures for thrust chambers, injectors, and turbopump systems, which complicate design and increase production time and expenses.

Innovation Solution

The use of additive manufacturing techniques, specifically direct metal laser sintering, to produce components such as thrust chambers, injectors, and turbopumps, allowing for complex geometries and varying surface roughness in coolant flow passages to enhance cooling performance and reduce assembly complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional manufacturing techniques are used for thrust chambers and turbopumps, then manufacturing precision can be achieved, but device complexity and production cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethrust chamber manufacturing precisionVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple separate components (thrust chamber, injector, turbopump) into integrated assemblies using additive manufacturing. The thrust chamber includes an integrated injector assembly, and the turbopump assembly integrates the pump with the thrust chamber mounting, reducing the number of separate parts and assembly steps while maintaining manufacturing precision through direct digital manufacturing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Strength

If traditional manufacturing techniques are used, then component strength can be ensured, but production time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethrust chamber strengthVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the manufacturing parameter from traditional subtractive or formative methods to additive manufacturing processes. This enables direct construction of complex geometries in a single process step, significantly reducing production time while maintaining or improving component strength through controlled material deposition and layer-by-layer building

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If smooth surfaces are used in coolant passages, then pressure drop is reduced, but cooling efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoolant pressure dropVSAvoidthrust chamber cooling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different surface qualities to different regions of the coolant passages. Smooth surfaces are used in sections where pressure drop reduction is critical, while enhanced roughness or specific surface features are applied in regions where heat transfer enhancement is the priority, optimizing both energy loss and cooling efficiency locally

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of manufacture

If simple geometries are used for turbopump impeller, then manufacturing is easier, but cooling performance is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpeller manufacturing easeVSAvoidimpeller cooling performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the manufacturing approach to additive manufacturing, which enables the creation of complex impeller geometries with internal coolant passages and optimized cooling features that would be impossible or extremely difficult to achieve with traditional manufacturing methods, thereby improving cooling performance without sacrificing manufacturing feasibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach simplifies the assembly and design of rocket engine components, reduces production costs, and improves cooling efficiency by enabling precise control over surface roughness and geometry, leading to more effective heat transfer and reduced pressure drop.

Implementation Method 1

direct metal laser sintering

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser heating: Laser

Implementation Method 2

additive manufacturing process to form a rocket engine component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 3

coolant flow passages that extend from a first end of the thrust chamber to a second end of the thrust chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 4

regenerative cooling, in which one of the propellants is circulated through the walls of the thrust chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Data Source

PatentUS11022073B1Rocket engine turbopump with coolant passage in impeller central hub
Publication Date: 2021.06.01 ROCKET LAB USA INC
  • US11022073B1 patent drawing
  • US11022073B1 patent drawing
  • US11022073B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are various technologies pertinent to rocket engines, including injector, thrust chamber, and electrical turbopump devices that may be combined to provide a more efficient rocket engine. The electrical turbopump impeller includes a coolant bypass port fluidically connected with a coolant passage that passes through the impeller central hub and allows some of the propellant that is acted on by the impeller to bypass the impeller outlet and instead be flowed into the electrical turbopump housing so that the diverted propellant may be used to cool the various components housed within the housing such as the electric motor bearings, stator, rotor, and electronics.