Open Impeller Winglet Design for Abrasive Pump Wear Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing submergible pumps used in mining, tunneling, and construction sites face efficiency and wear issues due to abrasive materials like sand and stone, leading to rapid blade wear and increased power consumption, as the differential pressure across the impeller blades causes jet-flow and increased gap distance between the blade and wear plate.

Innovation Solution

An open impeller design with winglets located radially outside an inner radius and extending to the trailing edge, increasing the gap width only where differential pressure is highest, minimizing cross-flow and wear while maintaining efficient flow area and reducing power consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the gap between the lower edge of the blade and the wear plate is reduced to increase pumping efficiency, then the pumping performance is improved, but the blade wear increases rapidly due to jet-flow of abrasive matter

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepumping performanceVSAvoidblade wear resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing wear protection only at the trailing edge region of the blade where the lower edge faces the wear plate, rather than protecting the entire blade. The wear-resistant element is positioned specifically at the location subjected to jet-flow of abrasive matter, creating a localized protective zone that addresses the wear problem without affecting overall blade performance or requiring full-blade protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Duration of action of stationary object

If winglets are added to the blade to reduce wear, then the blade lifespan is extended, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpeller lifespanVSAvoidimpeller structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The wear-resistant element is designed as a separate, detachable component that can be independently positioned and removed, rather than being an integrated part of the blade structure. This segmentation allows the wear protection function to be added without permanently complicating the impeller design, and the modular element can be replaced independently when worn.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The wear-resistant element functions as a sacrificial component designed to wear away over time while protecting the main blade. This disposable element can be easily replaced when worn, extending the overall impeller lifespan without requiring complex redesigns or replacements of the entire impeller assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If the winglet extends from the leading edge to the trailing edge of the blade, then the wear protection is maximized, but the flow area of the impeller channels is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear protectionVSAvoidflow area efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The wear-resistant element is positioned only at the trailing edge region of the blade where the lower edge faces the wear plate, rather than extending along the entire blade length. This localized placement provides wear protection exactly where jet-flow of abrasive matter occurs, while preserving the flow area and hydraulic performance of the impeller channels in other regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design prolongs the lifespan of impellers by 30-50% by reducing wear and maintaining efficiency, as the winglet placement minimizes power consumption and extends the need for replacement, while adapting to varying differential pressures across different impeller sizes.

Implementation Method 1

there is a pressure difference between the suction side (radially inner side) of the blade and the pressure side (radially outer side) of the blade

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDifferential pressure: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

The pressure difference over the blade, or differential pressure across the lower edge gap, results in a jet-flow of media, i.e. liquid and abrasive matter, from the pressure side to the suction side through the narrow gap between the lower edge of the blade and the wear plate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJet-flow: Jet

Implementation Method 3

The jet-flow of pumped media through the gap will wear down the lower edge of the blade

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWear: Wear

Data Source

PatentUS12031554B2Open impeller for submergible pump configured for pumping liquid comprising abrasive matter
Publication Date: 2024.07.09 XYLEM EURO GMBH
  • US12031554B2 patent drawing
  • US12031554B2 patent drawing
  • US12031554B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An open impeller for a submergible pump for pumping abrasive fluids. The impeller has a cover plate, a hub and at least two spirally swept blades, each blade having a leading edge, a trailing edge, and a lower edge extending from the leading edge to the trailing edge and separating the suction and pressure sides of the blade. At least one blade includes a winglet at the lower edge projecting from the suction side, located radially outside an inner radius of the impeller, and extending circumferentially to the trailing edge at the suction side at a maximum radius of the impeller. The lower edge and winglet lower wear surface are configured to be located opposite of and facing a pump wear plate. The inner radius is equal to the largest of the maximum radius of the impeller multiplied by 0.6, and an inlet radius of the impeller multiplied by 1.2.