Implant Delivery Shuttle Assembly for Consistent Intraocular Injection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing implant delivery devices for intraocular injections suffer from inconsistent implant delivery speeds due to manual user input, leading to potential impact on non-targeted tissues in the eye during intravitreal injections.

Innovation Solution

An auto delivery device that decouples implant delivery speed from user input, utilizing a shuttle assembly and dampener mechanism to ensure consistent and controlled implant insertion into the eye, with visual and tactile feedback for completion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual operation of the delivery device is used, then ease of operation is improved, but implant delivery speed consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidimplant delivery speed consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The delivery device uses a spring-loaded shuttle assembly that automatically pushes the implant through the cannula without requiring continuous manual pressure. The spring mechanism self-regulates the delivery speed based on the pre-loaded force, eliminating variability caused by user manipulation while maintaining ease of operation through a simple trigger activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The shuttle assembly is pre-loaded with a spring mechanism before use, storing mechanical energy that is then released at a controlled rate during implant delivery. This preliminary preparation ensures consistent delivery speed independent of user input force, as the spring releases energy at a predetermined rate rather than requiring continuous manual control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If higher implant delivery speed is used, then productivity is improved, but harmful factors to non-target tissues increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant delivery speedVSAvoidimpact on non-target tissues
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The device changes the parameter of delivery speed control from user-dependent variable speed to spring-controlled constant speed. The spring mechanism releases stored energy at a predetermined rate, ensuring the implant exits the cannula at a safe, consistent speed that is neither too fast (causing tissue damage) nor too slow (reducing productivity), thus optimizing both parameters simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If the implant delivery speed is decoupled from user input, then implant delivery consistency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant delivery speed consistencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spring-loaded shuttle assembly is a self-regulating mechanism that automatically maintains consistent delivery speed without requiring external control systems, sensors, or complex electronics. The mechanical spring naturally provides feedback control by releasing stored energy at a constant rate, achieving precision delivery speed consistency while keeping the device structure simple and reliable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures safe and consistent implant delivery by maintaining a controlled speed independent of user force, reducing the risk of non-target tissue impact and ensuring complete implant ejection from the needle before withdrawal.

Implementation Method 1

a resilient member (17) positioned within a dampener housing (15)... Axial movement of the shuttle assembly, and hence automatic delivery of the implants, is caused by a release of a pre-loaded biasing force exerted by the resilient member (17) on the shuttle assembly (14)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

The friction slider (16) can form an airtight seal with the inside surface (20) of the dampener housing (15)... The axial movement speed of the shuttle assembly (14) is controlled by the interaction of the friction slider (16) with the inside surface (20) of the dampener housing (15)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS12370082B2Implant delivery device
Publication Date: 2025.07.29 ALCON INC
  • US12370082B2 patent drawing
  • US12370082B2 patent drawing
  • US12370082B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Implant delivery devices, methods of device assembly and methods of using those devices are presented where the delivery device uses an automatic implant delivery mechanism that eliminates variability in pusher wire speeds by providing a needle assembly having one or more implants positioned within a proximal end of a needle cannula, a dampener assembly and a shuttle assembly located within a housing along with the activation member which holds the shuttle assembly in cocked or pre-tensioned state. A lock can be engaged with the activation member to prevent premature firing or triggering of the device.