Endovascular Implant Deployment Simulation for Hemodynamic Planning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Clinicians face challenges in selecting and optimizing endovascular implants for treating pathologies like aneurysms due to the complexity of available options and the need to consider multiple factors, including device type, placement, and hemodynamic parameters, often requiring multiple devices with varying configurations.

Innovation Solution

A physics-based model simulates endovascular implant deployment in a patient's vessel using medical imaging data, incorporating machine learning to predict outcomes and optimize implant selection and placement, accounting for patient-specific information and hemodynamic parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a complete explicit representation of the mesh and the Finite Element Analysis method is used, then the accuracy of implant deployment simulation is improved, but the computational cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of implant deployment simulationVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the mathematical parameters and approximation methods used in the simulation. Instead of using complete explicit representations and full Finite Element Analysis, the system employs simplified geometric models, implicit representations, and reduced-order modeling techniques that maintain sufficient accuracy while dramatically reducing computational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and removes unnecessary computational complexity from the simulation process. By separating essential physical principles from redundant mathematical computations, the system retains the core functionality of implant deployment simulation while eliminating the computationally expensive complete explicit representation and full FEA methodology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple flow diverters with varying configurations are considered, then the treatment options for aneurysms increase, but the decision-making complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment options for aneurysmsVSAvoiddecision-making complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual copies and simulations of different implant configurations and deployment scenarios. By modeling multiple flow diverter options and their potential placements in the patient's vasculature through computational simulations, the system provides clinicians with predictive information about outcomes for different treatment paths without requiring manual analysis of each complex configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms that provide clinicians with predictive information about treatment outcomes based on the simulated deployment of different implant configurations. The system analyzes hemodynamic parameters, aneurysm occlusion probability, and other critical factors to provide feedback on which configurations are most likely to succeed, thereby simplifying the decision-making process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Shape

If ad-hoc external forces and internal stresses are used in stent modeling, then the geometric deformation can be simulated, but the mechanical properties of the stent may not be accurately represented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric deformation of stentVSAvoidmechanical properties of stent
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces ad-hoc mechanical force models with more physically accurate representations of stent mechanics. Instead of using arbitrary external forces and internal stresses, the system employs material constitutive models, contact mechanics, and physics-based deformation theories that accurately capture the mechanical behavior of stents under physiological conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12605206B2Endovascular implant decision support in medical imaging
Publication Date: 2026.04.21 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US12605206B2 patent drawing
  • US12605206B2 patent drawing
  • US12605206B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vascular implant decision support uses a medical imaging system. A physics-based model of the endovascular implant is used to simulate deployment in a vessel model of a patient based on medical imaging. A porosity of the deployed implant and the simulation are used to determine a value for each of one or more hemodynamic parameters to support the decision for endovascular treatment. A machine-learned network uses patient-specific information to select the endovascular implant, placement, and/or other implant configuration used to simulate deployment and/or to predict outcome from deployment for the patient. The clinician may use the decision support to select among options for implanting and/or to confirm adequacy of a plan. Various of these approaches may be used alone or in combination.