Implantable Flow Restrictor Control for Chronic Diuresis Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current nonpharmacological therapies for heart failure, such as reducing volume overload and preload, lack chronic controllability and adjustability, and systemic diuretics significantly impact patient quality of life.

Innovation Solution

Implantable flow restriction systems with controllers and actuators that can occlude or divert blood flow controllably and selectively within the vasculature, allowing for partial or full occlusion of vessels, and include microcontrollers, actuators, and power sources for precise control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current nonpharmacological therapies are used to reduce volume overload and preload, then heart function can be improved, but the therapies lack chronic controllability and adjustability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechronic controllabilityVSAvoidadjustability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The flow restrictor device is designed to be dynamically adjustable between different occlusion states (fully open, partially occluded, fully occluded) through an actuation mechanism that can be controlled chronically. This allows the device to adapt to changing patient needs and provides long-term controllability without pharmacological intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device changes the flow restriction parameter of the blood vessel by varying the occlusion level. By adjusting the degree of vessel occlusion, the system can control blood flow dynamics, renal congestion, and diuresis to different extents, providing both reliability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If systemic diuretics are applied to control diuresis, then diuresis can be controlled, but patient quality of life is significantly affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient quality of lifeVSAvoiddiuresis control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the diuresis control mechanism from systemic pharmacological intervention and relocates it to a localized mechanical flow restriction device. By placing the flow restrictor in the blood vessel, the system achieves diuresis control through physical flow management rather than systemic drug administration, thereby improving patient quality of life while maintaining reliable control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If an implantable flow restriction system is implemented, then chronic control of blood flow is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechronic control capabilityVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex electronic control systems with a simpler mechanical actuation mechanism. The actuator uses mechanical means to adjust the flow restrictor position, reducing the need for complex electronics, power sources, and control circuitry while still achieving chronic controllability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The control member acts as an intermediary element that transmits actuation force from the actuator to the flow restrictor. This intermediate mechanical linkage simplifies the overall system architecture by providing a direct mechanical transmission path without requiring complex electronic actuators or control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides chronic control of diuresis without systemic drugs, enhancing heart function by reducing renal congestion, cardiac preload, and improving cardiac output through adjustable blood flow management.

Implementation Method 1

The actuator can include a motor. The motor can be coupled to the second end of the control member to actuate the control member.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS20260020856A1Systems, devices, and methods for controlling an implantable flow restriction system
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 INQB8 MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US20260020856A1 patent drawing
  • US20260020856A1 patent drawing
  • US20260020856A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A flow restriction system may include an implantable controller system for controlling an implantable flow restrictor. The controller system may include: an implantable housing, an actuator at least partially disposed within the implantable housing, the actuator having a first configuration corresponding to the implantable flow restrictor being in the low profile state and a second configuration corresponding to the implantable flow restrictor being in the high profile pressure restricting state, an internal power source configured to supply current to the actuator, and a processor configured to control operation of the actuator using power from the internal power source.