Implantable Cardiac Signal Filtering for Adaptive R-Wave Sensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing implantable medical devices (IMDs) face challenges in accurately filtering cardiac signals due to varying electrophysiological properties among patients and changes over time, leading to incorrect signal interpretation and interference from noise sources, which affects R-wave sensing and arrhythmia detection.

Innovation Solution

A system with multiple band pass filters and a processor that analyzes filtered signals to determine the optimal filter setting based on individual-specific electrocardiogram signals, optimizing noise attenuation while preserving R-wave amplitude, using scoring criteria to select the most suitable filter.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If fixed filter settings are used in IMD, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision of cardiac signals deteriorates due to varying electrophysiological properties among patients

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilter settingsVSAvoidsignal interpretation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic filter settings that automatically adapt to each patient's specific electrophysiological characteristics. The system evaluates multiple filter configurations (different cutoff frequencies and filter orders) and selects the optimal settings based on the patient's signal characteristics, transforming static filter parameters into dynamic, patient-specific configurations that maintain measurement precision without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes filter parameters (cutoff frequencies, filter orders) based on patient-specific signal analysis. By evaluating how different parameter combinations affect signal quality metrics such as R-wave detection accuracy and noise attenuation, the system optimizes filter parameters for each individual patient, resolving the contradiction between simplified fixed settings and precise measurement requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If aggressive filtering is applied to remove noise, then noise attenuation is improved, but R-wave amplitude is reduced leading to incorrect signal interpretation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise attenuationVSAvoidR-wave sensing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies filtering actions selectively rather than uniformly. It evaluates multiple filter configurations with varying degrees of aggressiveness and selects the optimal level of filtering that achieves sufficient noise attenuation while preserving R-wave amplitude. This partial action approach avoids both insufficient filtering and excessive filtering that would distort the signal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms to evaluate filter performance based on signal quality metrics. By monitoring how different filter settings affect R-wave detection accuracy and noise attenuation, the system adjusts filter parameters to achieve the optimal balance between noise removal and signal preservation, ensuring correct signal interpretation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple filter configurations are evaluated to optimize performance, then adaptability to individual patients is improved, but device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient-specific optimizationVSAvoidfilter evaluation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the filter evaluation process into discrete, manageable configurations. Instead of continuously varying filter parameters, the system evaluates a finite set of predefined filter configurations (specific cutoff frequencies and filter orders), making the adaptation process more tractable and less complex while still achieving patient-specific optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically evaluating multiple filter configurations and selecting the optimal settings based on the patient's signal characteristics without requiring external intervention. This automated self-optimization reduces the complexity burden on clinicians and patients while achieving high adaptability to individual needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP4111948B1Method and system for optimizing filter settings of an implantable medical device
Publication Date: 2026.01.21 PACESETTER INC
  • EP4111948B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP4111948B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4111948B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system and a method include an implantable medical device (IMD) (14, 100, 300) having one or more inputs (302) configured to receive one or more sensed signals (303) from one or more electrodes (305). A plurality of filters (304a, 304b, 304c) are configured to filter the one or more sensed signals (303) and output a plurality of filtered signals (310a, 310b, 310c). Memory (308) is configured to store program instructions. A processor (306), when executing the program instructions, is configured to receive the plurality of filtered signals (310a, 310b, 310c), and analyze the plurality of filtered signals (310a, 310b, 310c) to determine a desired one of the plurality of filters (304a, 304b, 304c).