Implantable Electric Stimulation With Biomarker Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electrical stimulation devices deliver therapy based on static programs determined by trial and error, leading to over- or under-stimulation and inefficient power consumption, reducing battery life.

Innovation Solution

A system that toggles between multiple stimulation programs based on monitored biomarkers, such as patient symptoms and physiological signals, to optimize therapy delivery and conserve power.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If static stimulation programs are used, then device complexity is reduced, but therapy effectiveness deteriorates due to over- or under-stimulation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestimulation program structureVSAvoidtherapy effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic stimulation programming that automatically adjusts stimulation parameters based on real-time biomarker feedback. The system transitions from static pre-programmed therapy to adaptive closed-loop control, where stimulation intensity and delivery are continuously optimized according to measured physiological responses, thereby maintaining therapy effectiveness without requiring complex manual reprogramming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms by monitoring biomarkers (such as pain levels, physiological signals) and using this information to automatically adjust stimulation parameters. This closed-loop feedback control enables the device to respond to patient needs in real-time, improving therapy effectiveness while maintaining relatively simple device architecture through algorithmic adaptation rather than hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Use of energy by moving object

If static stimulation programs are used, then power consumption is increased due to over-stimulation, but battery life is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidbattery life
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses biomarker feedback to dynamically adjust stimulation intensity, delivering higher power only when clinically indicated and reducing or suspending stimulation when therapeutic goals are achieved. This feedback-driven power management prevents wasteful over-stimulation and extends battery life by optimizing energy delivery to match actual patient needs in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically changes stimulation parameters (amplitude, pulse width, frequency, duty cycle) based on measured biomarker responses. By dynamically adjusting these parameters rather than maintaining fixed high-level stimulation, the system reduces average power consumption while maintaining therapeutic effectiveness, thereby extending battery operation duration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If frequent reprogramming is performed, then therapy effectiveness is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapy effectivenessVSAvoidreprogramming convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-adjustment of stimulation parameters by automatically monitoring biomarkers and modifying therapy delivery without requiring user intervention. This self-service capability eliminates the need for frequent manual reprogramming sessions, making the device easier to operate while maintaining optimized therapy effectiveness through autonomous adaptation to patient responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Through continuous biomarker monitoring and automated feedback control, the system independently optimizes therapy parameters without requiring external reprogramming input. This feedback-driven autonomy resolves the contradiction by enabling effective therapy adaptation while eliminating the operational burden of frequent manual adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12440679B2Electric stimulation system
Publication Date: 2025.10.14 MEDTRONIC INC
  • US12440679B2 patent drawing
  • US12440679B2 patent drawing
  • US12440679B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example method of cycling electric stimulation includes delivering, via an implantable device, electric stimulation to a patient in accordance with a first therapy program; monitoring, via the implantable device and while the electric stimulation is being delivered in accordance with the first therapy program, a biomarker; and responsive to determining the biomarker satisfies a threshold, delivering, via the implantable device, electric stimulation to the patient in accordance with a second therapy program that is different than the first therapy program.